slcdailylaw
  • Home
  • Topic Search
  • Advanced Search
  • Citation Search
  • Bookmarks
  • Login
  • Superme Court
  • High Courts
(1) SUPREME COURT
Compensation

A. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Sections 166, 168—Compensation—Assessment of functional disability—High Court reduced disability from 63% to 30% without proper analysis—Medical evidence including disability certificate and neuropsychological report remained uncontroverted—Held, functional disability must reflect actual loss of earning capacity—Considering cognitive impairment, partial blindness and nature of employment as Manager, functional disability assessed at 100%—Reduction by High Court unjustified. (Paras 21, 26, 29, 30) B. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Sections 166, 168—Just compensation—Multiplier method—Future loss of earning capacity—Severe neurological and physical impairments resulted in total loss of earning capacity—Applying multiplier method...

(2) SUPREME COURT

A. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 141—Precedent—Binding nature of judgments—Reliance on earlier order in Ram Naresh Singh v. Bokaro Steel Ltd.—Held, order dated 31.03.2017 was based on facts and equitable considerations and cannot be treated as binding precedent—Subsequent three-Judge Bench order dated 15.12.2020 clarifies legal position—High Court erred in treating earlier order as binding—Impugned judgment set aside. (Paras 16, 17, 18) B. Payment of Gratuity—SAIL Gratuity Rules, 1978—Rule 3.2.1(c)—Withholding of gratuity—Adjustment of penal rent—Non-vacation of staff quarters by ex-employees—Management entitled to withhold gratuity and adjust penal rent for unauthorised occupation—Obligations of employee (to vacate) and employer (to re...

(3) SUPREME COURT

A. Indian Contract Act, 1872—Sections 126, 127, 128, 140—Contract of guarantee—Corporate guarantee—Liability of surety—Document styled as “Corporate Guarantee” coupled with prior and subsequent communications clearly evidenced an unequivocal undertaking by Defendant No.1 to discharge liability of vessel owner towards plaintiff—Held, constitutes a valid contract of guarantee and not merely a freight payment arrangement—Liability of surety is co-extensive with that of principal debtor and can be enforced independently—Creditor not bound to proceed first against principal debtor—Defendant No.1 liable to pay despite erroneous remittance by bank—Right of recovery from principal debtor preserved under doctrine of subrogation. (Paras 15 to 18, 23 to 25, 33) B. Code o...

(4) SUPREME COURT
Bail

A. Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 21, 32—Personal liberty—Right to legal representation—Bail—Where accused persons were denied effective legal representation due to hostile atmosphere created by members of Bar and remained in custody for over two months for a minor scuffle—Held, continued detention unjustified and violative of right to personal liberty under Article 21—Supreme Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 32 directed release on bail—Fundamental right includes fair opportunity to defend and access to legal remedies. (Paras 13 to 17) B. Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 21, 32—Fair trial—Transfer of criminal proceedings—Where local Bar created atmosphere of fear preventing advocates from representing accused—Fair trial and acces...

Bail Granted
(5) SUPREME COURT
Quashing of FIR

A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 482—Penal Code, 1860—Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120B—Quashing of FIR—Scope—Premature interference—High Court quashed FIR at threshold despite serious allegations of fraud, forgery, conspiracy and misappropriation—Investigation was ongoing and vital evidence including forensic/handwriting expert’s report was awaited—Held, premature quashing of FIR unjustified—Allegations in FIR and material collected disclose cognizable offences and constitute a prima facie case—Prosecution cannot be stifled at nascent stage—Order quashing FIR set aside. (Paras 9, 11, 14, 20, 23, 24) B. Evidence—Forensic examination—Forgery—State Forensic Science Laboratory (SFSL) report—Evidentiary value—Dis...

Appeal allowed
(6) SUPREME COURT

A. Civil Procedure—Compliance of Court Orders—Interpretation of Supreme Court directions—Relief—Compensation vs alternative performance—Where earlier orders granted option to supply coal “in lieu of compensation”, the same cannot be interpreted to claim monetary compensation when Court specifically modified relief—Orders must be read as a whole and not selectively—Parties cannot expand scope of relief based on convenient interpretation—Held, Respondent entitled only to supply of coal for the suspended period at “current price” and as per prevailing policy, and not to monetary compensation—Miscellaneous Applications seeking compensation rejected. (Paras 11 to 14) B. Contract/Commercial Law—Fuel Supply Agreement—Compliance—Equitable direc...

(7) SUPREME COURT

A. Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 14, 21; Code on Social Security, 2020—Section 60(4) (formerly Maternity Benefit Act, 1961—Section 5(4))—Maternity benefit—Adoptive mothers—Age restriction—Validity—Provision restricting maternity benefit to adoptive mothers of children below three months—Held unconstitutional—Classification arbitrary and lacking rational nexus with object of legislation—Adoptive mothers of children above three months are similarly situated—Denial violates equality, dignity, and reproductive autonomy—Maternity benefit extends beyond biological childbirth to emotional and social aspects of motherhood—Provision read down to remove age restriction. (Paras 3 to 92, 166 to 168) B. Code on Social Security, 2020—Section 60(4); ...

(8) SUPREME COURT

A. Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992—Sections 11, 11B, 15HA—SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003—Regulations 3 & 4—Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956—Section 21, 23E—Preferential allotment—Diversion of funds—Fraud—Funds raised through preferential issue must be utilized strictly in accordance with objects disclosed in EoGM notice as mandated under SEBI ICDR Regulations—Immediate diversion of funds for undisclosed purposes (loans/investments) establishes fraudulent intent and violation of PFUTP Regulations—“Fraud” under PFUTP has wide amplitude and includes acts inducing investors even without deceit—Misleading disclosures affecting investor decision-making am...

Appeal dismissed
(9) SUPREME COURT
Bail

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 376(2)(n), 384—Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023—Sections 78(2), 75(2), 79, 61(2)—Bail—Regular bail—Grant of bail justified where charges already framed, some witnesses examined and continued incarceration not necessary at that stage—Delay in lodging FIR is a relevant factor for grant of bail—However, considering seriousness of allegations, stringent conditions can be imposed to balance liberty of accused with protection of victim—Accused directed not to approach or contact victim, not to influence witnesses and to cooperate in trial—High Court order rejecting bail set aside. ...

Bail Granted
(10) SUPREME COURT
Appeal against acquittal

A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 498A—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 379—Murder—Cruelty—Dying declaration—Evidentiary value—Conviction based on reliable eyewitness testimony (daughter of deceased), corroborated by medical evidence and dying declaration—Dying declaration recorded with medical certification of fitness cannot be discarded merely due to extent of burn injuries or absence of nurse—Minor inconsistencies in testimonies or hospital records not sufficient to discredit otherwise cogent evidence—Evidence of doctors establishing consciousness of deceased prevails over contrary oral assertions—Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that accused poured kerosene and set deceased on fire—Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC upheld.&n...

Appeal dismissed
(1) ALLAHABAD
Quashing of proceeding, Rape, False Promise of Marriage

A. Criminal Procedure—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 482—Quashing of proceedings—High Court’s inherent power to quash proceedings is to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice—Such power must be exercised sparingly, with great caution, and only in rare and appropriate cases. B. Penal Law—Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 376—Promise of marriage—A prolonged consensual physical relationship between educated adults indicates voluntary cohabitation—Mere failure to marry does not ipso facto constitute rape unless consent was obtained by a false promise from the inception. C. Section 376 IPC—Essential ingredients—Offence under Section 376(2)(n) IPC is not made out where there is no evidence that the promise of marriage existed at the inceptio...

(2) GAUHATI
NDPS

A. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023—Section 483—Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Sections 21(c), 25, 29, 37—Bail—Commercial quantity— Recovery of 464 grams of heroin—Offence involves commercial quantity—Rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act applicable—Bail can be granted only if twin conditions satisfied, viz. (i) reasonable grounds to believe that accused is not guilty, and (ii) not likely to commit offence while on bail—“Reasonable grounds” means more than prima facie satisfaction—In absence of such satisfaction and existence of prima facie case, bail not maintainable—Application rejected. (Paras 5-8) B. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 37—Bail principles—Scope of judicial scrutin...

Rejected
(3) CALCUTTA
Writ jurisdiction

A. Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002—Sections 8(1), 17(4), 20, 21—Adjudicating Authority (Procedure) Regulations, 2013—Rule 13(2)—Show Cause Notice—Relied Upon Documents (RUDs)— Non-supply of complete RUDs alleged—Service of notice through electronic mode (email/PDF) held valid—However, compliance with Rule 13(2) requires supply of complete relied upon documents—Held, it is for Adjudicating Authority to determine whether documents sought are in fact “relied upon documents”—If found so and not supplied, Authority must direct Enforcement Directorate to furnish the same before proceeding further—Opportunity to file effective reply is integral to fair adjudication—Writ disposed of with directions. (Paras 17, 20, 28-30) B. Prevention of Money-launder...

Disposed of
(4) PUNJAB & HARYANA

A. Regular Bail—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 439—In a case involving offences under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B (cheating and forgery in a luxury vehicle transaction), bail was granted—The petitioner had been in custody for nearly 10 months, the trial was magisterial in nature, and its conclusion would take considerable time—There was no material indicating risk of absconding or tampering with evidence, making further detention unnecessary. B. Article 21—Article 21 of the Constitution of India—Speedy Trial—The Court emphasized that the right to speedy trial applies irrespective of the seriousness of the offence—Where the State cannot ensure a timely trial, continued incarceration becomes unjustified, and bail should ordinarily be granted. ...

(5) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Condonation of delay

A. Condonation of Delay—Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5—An extraordinary delay of 3952 days in filing the appeal was condoned by adopting a liberal and justice-oriented approach—The Court emphasized that in land acquisition matters, substantial justice must prevail over technicalities, especially where similarly situated landowners had already been granted enhanced compensation through a common judgment—However, to balance equities, condonation was made subject to denial of interest for the delayed period. B. Enhanced Compensation—Parity Principle—Under Sections 4, 6, and 18 of the Act, where land is acquired through the same notification and covered by a common judgment, all similarly situated landowners are entitled to equal compensation—Denial of such bene...

Disposed of
(6) KARNATAKA
Cheating

A. Quashing of Proceedings—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 482—The High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings must be exercised sparingly and with caution—At this stage, the Court cannot undertake appreciation of evidence—Where serious triable issues and disputed questions of fact exist, the matter must proceed to trial rather than be quashed prematurely. B. Cheating—Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 420—A prima facie offence of cheating is made out when there is dishonest intention from the inception, leading victims to part with money—Collection of large sums from multiple investors followed by diversion or siphoning of funds supports the allegation of cheating. C. Financial Statutes—Applicability—Offences under the Karnataka Protection o...

(7) PATNA
Validity

A. Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules—Validity & Maintainability—Challenge to the Civil Procedure (Mediation) (Amendment) Rules, 2019 (Bihar) and related reliefs (fees, restructuring, administrative control, etc.) was rejected on the ground of non-impleadment of necessary parties—Petitioners failed to implead newly appointed mediators whose rights would be directly affected—The Court held that a writ under Article 226 cannot be adjudicated in the absence of such vitally affected persons—Petition dismissed. B. Natural Justice—Audi Alteram Partem—The Court reaffirmed the fundamental principle that no adverse order can be passed against a person without hearing them—Deciding a writ petition in the absence of necessary and affected parties amounts to violation of principles of natural just...

Dismissed
(8) HIMACHAL PRADESH

A. NDPS Bail—Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 37 (Commercial Quantity)—In cases involving commercial quantity, bail is an exception—The Court must be satisfied of the twin conditions: (i) reasonable grounds that the accused is not guilty, and (ii) that the accused is not likely to commit any offence while on bail—Mere prolonged incarceration or delay in trial is insufficient to satisfy these mandatory requirements. B. Scope of Bail Jurisdiction—At the stage of bail, courts should not undertake a detailed appreciation of evidence or examine contradictions in witness statements—Such evaluation falls strictly within the domain of the trial court. C. Speedy Trial—Limitation on Claim by Accused—While the right to speedy trial is recognized, an accused canno...

(9) CALCUTTA

A. Arbitration—Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 34—Setting aside award—Awards were set aside where the respondent failed to prove their existence and validity—Absence of signed copies and supporting arbitration records led the Court to conclude that no valid awards existed—The purported awards were held vitiated by fraud, patent illegality, and violation of public policy. B. Limitation—Section 34(3)—Limitation to challenge an award begins only upon receipt of a signed copy—Since the petitioner never received signed awards and only photocopies were produced, limitation had not commenced; petitions were held maintainable. C. “No Award” challenge under Section 34—Section 34 permits challenge even on the ground of non-existence of an award—Courts...

(10) PUNJAB & HARYANA

A. NDPS Law—Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Sections 22, 25, 37—Bail (commercial quantity)—In a case involving recovery of commercial quantity of Tramadol, the Court held that the stringent conditions under Section 37 were not satisfied—Trial had commenced and some witnesses were examined, but no grounds existed to grant bail—Petition dismissed. B. NDPS Act—Sections 35 & 37—Bail considerations—Grant of bail requires careful evaluation of prosecution material, including role, knowledge, and control over contraband—Bail cannot be granted merely on the ground of prolonged custody or delay in trial without addressing statutory presumptions and prosecution allegations. C. NDPS Act—Section 37—Strict compliance—Offences involving commerci...

slcdailylaw

Tomar Publication

561, Sec-2, Jagriti Vihar, Meerut-250004

0121 3561932, +91 9458 5523 61

tomarpublication999@gmail.com

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

© SLC Daily law all right reserved.

Cookies Required

Please enable cookies in your browser settings to continue.