(1) SUPREME COURT
A. Constitution of India, 1950—Art. 226—Writ of Certiorari—Scope of judicial review—Reappreciation of evidence—Impermissibility—Held, while exercising jurisdiction under Art. 226, the High Court does not sit as an appellate court over the decisions of subordinate courts or tribunals—The writ of certiorari is confined to correcting jurisdictional errors, manifest errors of law, patent illegality, or violations of the principles of natural justice—Findings of fact arrived at on appreciation of evidence cannot ordinarily be interfered with unless shown to be based on no evidence, or founded entirely on surmises, conjectures, or perversity. (Paras 12 & 13) B. Constitution of India, 1950—Art. 226—Principles of Natural Justice—Audi alteram partem—Right of hearing&mda...
(2) SUPREME COURT
A. Constitution of India, 1950—Art. 21—Right to life and personal liberty—Elderly and terminally ill prisoners—Humane treatment and continued incarceration—Held, continued incarceration of prisoners suffering from advanced age or terminal illness raises serious concerns under Art. 21—The administration of criminal justice must remain consistent with the constitutional values of dignity, proportionality, compassion and the possibility of reformation—Punishment cannot be divorced from humanitarian considerations where continued detention ceases to serve the ends of justice—Appropriate policies and mechanisms are required to ensure timely identification, consideration and release of eligible elderly and terminally ill prisoners in accordance with law. (Paras 3 to 39) B. Legal Services Author...
(3) SUPREME COURT
Burden of Proof
A. Railways Act, 1989—Sections 93, 97 & 65(2)—Carriage of goods—"Owner's risk" rate—Liability of Railways—Burden of proof—Goods booked and transported at the owner's risk rate—Claim for compensation on account of loss, destruction, deterioration, or non-delivery—Held, by virtue of S. 97, the Railway Administration is not liable for loss or non-delivery of goods carried at the owner's risk rate unless negligence or misconduct on the part of the Railway or its servants is affirmatively established—Further, where the consignment is accepted without verification of weight or contents by railway staff, the proviso to S. 65(2) places the burden upon the consignor or consignee to prove the quantity and condition of the goods entrusted for carriage—Liabilit...
(4) SUPREME COURT
Service Law
A. Service Law—Compassionate Appointment Scheme for Public Sector General Insurance Companies—Cl. 1.1—Compassionate appointment—Voluntary retirement on medical grounds—Delay attributable to employer—Effect—Employee applied for voluntary retirement on medical grounds before attaining the prescribed age of 55 years and furnished the required medical certificate—Employer failed to scrutinize the application and communicate deficiencies within a reasonable time, but sought to reject the dependent's claim for compassionate appointment after the employee crossed the age limit—Held, an employer cannot take advantage of its own delay to defeat a claim under the Scheme—Applications made within the prescribed time must be processed expeditiously, and any defects must be promptly commun...
(5) SUPREME COURT
Proof of Will
A. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Section 96, Order XLI Rule 31—First Appeal—Scope and duty of First Appellate Court—Being the final court on facts, the First Appellate Court must independently assess the entire evidence, frame points for determination, record findings on each point with reasons, and deal with both questions of fact and law—Reversal of the Trial Court's judgment without proper appreciation of evidence or adequate reasons is unsustainable. (Paras 5 to 8) B. Indian Succession Act, 1925—Sections 59 and 63—Will—Proof of due execution—Propounder must establish that the testator was of sound disposing mind, understood the contents of the Will, and that the Will was duly attested by two witnesses in accordance with law—High Court erred in reversing the Trial Court...
(6) SUPREME COURT
Acquittal, Murder
A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 157—Murder—Eyewitnesses' testimonies found inconsistent and contradictory—FIR held to be ante-timed and prepared after commencement of investigation—Delay in forwarding FIR to Magistrate coupled with serious procedural irregularities rendered prosecution version unreliable—Prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt—Accused acquitted. (Paras 42 to 60) B. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 157—Delay in forwarding FIR to Magistrate—Mere delay is not by itself fatal—However, where delay is accompanied by surrounding circumstances indicating manipulation, ante-timing or fabrication of the FIR, the prosecution case becomes doubtful and the acc...
(7) SUPREME COURT
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 336 and 307 (altered) — Quashing of Criminal Proceedings — Compromise between parties — FIR arising out of a dispute between student groups during college elections — Allegations of assault and firing, though no medical evidence supported the allegation of gunshot — Parties, being young students, entered into a compromise and were not willing to pursue the allegations — High Court quashed FIR and consequential proceedings — Supreme Court found no error in the exercise of jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal. (Paras 3 to 5) ...
(8) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B — Anticipatory Bail — Allegation of cheating by selling a fake insurance policy and using forged documents — Parties subsequently entered into settlement and complainant acknowledged receipt of the amount due and stated that no further amount remained payable — In view of the settlement and undertaking to seek quashing of criminal proceedings before the jurisdictional High Court, Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant, subject to cooperation with investigation and appearance before the Investigating Officer and Courts as required. (Paras 3 to 5) ...
(9) SUPREME COURT
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 25 — Transfer Petition — Matrimonial proceedings — Wife sought transfer of divorce proceedings filed under Section 13-1(i)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by husband before Family Court, Nagpur, Maharashtra to Family Court, Begusarai, Bihar — Distance between the two places around 1081 kms and other proceedings between the parties also pending at Begusarai — Considering the inconvenience likely to be caused to the petitioner-wife and the interest of justice, Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition and directed transfer of proceedings to the Family Court, Begusarai, Bihar, with directions for mediation and appearance of parties. (Paras 7 to 11) ...
(10) SUPREME COURT
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 167(2) — Default Bail — Computation of statutory period of 90 days — Petitioners already in judicial custody in another case claimed to have been produced before the Sessions Court through production warrant on 27.01.2025 — Default bail application rejected on the ground that there was no actual production before the Court — Order-sheet, however, recorded the presence of the accused through production warrant — Supreme Court directed the Registrar General of the High Court to conduct an inquiry and submit a report regarding the actual date of production of the petitioners and the basis for the Trial Court's finding, holding that determination of the date of first production was crucial for deciding the petitioners' entitlement to default bail unde...
(4) MADHYA PRADESH
Maintenance, Jurisdiction
A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 125—Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956—Section 20(3)—Maintenance—Major unmarried daughter—Merely because an application for maintenance by a major unmarried daughter was filed under Section 125 CrPC instead of Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, relief cannot be denied where the Court otherwise possesses the jurisdiction to grant such relief—The Family Court, being competent to entertain proceedings under both enactments, rightly awarded interim maintenance, and no interference was called for. (Paras 6, 8, 9 and 15) B. Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956—Section 20(3)—Maintenance of major unmarried daughter—The statutory requirement for claiming maintenance under Section 20(3) is that the majo...
(6) DELHI
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 9—Interim measures—Dispute arising out of licence agreement—Where the petitioner challenged a demand notice raising concession fee on the ground that the respondent had unilaterally increased the number of train coaches contrary to the terms of the licence agreement, the Court held that an arbitrable dispute existed between the parties and directed that the disputes be resolved through arbitration. (Paras 3, 5 to 8, 11 and 13) B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Sections 9 and 11—Arbitration agreement—Appointment of Arbitrator—In view of the arbitration clause contained in the licence agreement and the existence of disputes relating to the validity of the demand notice and enhancement of concession fee, the Court appointed a Sole Arb...
(7) DELHI
Dishonour of cheque, Demand notice, Statutory notice
A. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Dishonour of cheque—Statutory demand notice—Validity—A statutory notice under Section 138 must relate to a legally enforceable debt or liability—Mere demand of an amount less than the aggregate cheque amount on account of admitted part-payments does not, by itself, render the notice invalid, where the notice discloses the basis of computation—Whether the amount demanded represents the legally enforceable debt is a matter to be determined on evidence during trial and not in revisional jurisdiction. (Paras 25, 35, 37 and 40) B. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Dishonour of cheque—Demand notice—Validity—The Sessions Court erred in holding the statutory notice invalid solely because the amount demanded was low...
(8) DELHI
Bail Application
A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 37—Bail—Commercial quantity—In offences involving commercial quantity of narcotic drugs, bail can be granted only after the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Public Prosecutor. B. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 50—Constitution of India, 1950—Article 22(1)—Grounds of arrest—The arrested person must be informed of the grounds of arrest to enable an effective defence—No particular format is prescribed, and substantial compliance with the statutory and constitutional requirement is sufficient unless prejudice is demonstrate...
(10) DELHI
A. Specific Relief Act, 1963—Specific performance—Readiness and willingness—In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must establish continuous readiness and willingness to perform the essential terms of the contract from the date of its execution till the date of hearing—Financial capacity to perform the contract must be proved by cogent evidence, and mere pleadings or bald assertions are insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement. (Paras 85 to 87, 92 and 99) B. Limitation Act, 1963—Section 3—Specific performance—Limitation—A suit for specific performance must be instituted within the prescribed period of limitation—Where the cause of action is dependent upon the conclusion of pending litigation, limitation commences upon the expiry of the stipulated period after dis...
