(1) SUPREME COURT
Further investigation
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 173(8)—Further investigation—Requirement of leave of Court—Though Section 173(8) CrPC does not expressly mandate prior permission of the Court for further investigation after filing of final report under Section 173(2), consistent judicial practice and doctrine of contemporanea expositio require investigating agencies to seek leave of the Magistrate/Court—Such requirement acts as a safeguard against abuse of power and arbitrary reopening of concluded investigations. [Paras 25, 26] B. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 173(2) & (8)—Acceptance of closure report—Power to order further investigation—Who can direct—Once a closure report is accepted by the Magistrate, power to direct further investigation vests only with the Magis...
(2) SUPREME COURT
Consumer Protection
A. Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Section 2(1)(d)—Definition of ‘Consumer’—Commercial purpose—Leasing of residential flat—Mere fact that a residential flat is leased out after possession does not ipso facto establish that the flat was purchased for a “commercial purpose” so as to exclude the buyer from the definition of ‘consumer’ under Section 2(1)(d). The determinative test is the dominant purpose behind the purchase, and unless a close and direct nexus with profit-generating commercial activity is established, the purchaser continues to be a consumer. [Paras 10, 17] B. Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Section 2(1)(d)—Commercial purpose—Dominant intention test—Whether a transaction is for a commercial purpose depends on the dominant intention b...
(3) SUPREME COURT
Appointment of Arbitrator
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 11 (pre-2015 regime)—Appointment of Arbitrator—Scope of jurisdiction—Where the arbitrator was appointed prior to 23-10-2015 under the regime of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd., the Section 11 Court was required to examine not only the existence but also the validity of the arbitration agreement—Order appointing arbitrator being a judicial order attains finality and binds parties at all subsequent stages. [Paras 18–22] B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 34—Challenge to arbitral award—Bar on reopening validity of arbitration clause—Once the Section 11 Court, in pre-2015 regime, appoints an arbitrator after impliedly or expressly holding existence and validity of arbitration agreement, parties are barre...
(4) SUPREME COURT
Custody of child
A. Guardians and Wards Act, 1890—Custody of Minor Children—Paramount consideration—Welfare of child—Relevant factors—While welfare of the child is the paramount consideration, court must evaluate cumulative impact of factors such as conduct of parents, educational continuity, stability, comfort, standard of living, past compliance with court orders, and inclination of minors—High Court erred in holding that such factors are irrelevant—Holistic assessment mandatory. [Paras 22, 24, 31] B. Custody Jurisdiction—International Child Removal—Effect of foreign court orders—Parental misconduct—Mother unilaterally removing minor children from Qatar to India mid-academic session without consent of guardian father and without court permission—Foreign court revoking custod...
(5) SUPREME COURT
Service Law
A. All India Services—IPS Cadre Allocation—Insider Vacancy—Claim of next candidate in merit—Once a candidate is allocated to a cadre pursuant to selection, the insider vacancy stands consumed—Non-acceptance or non-joining by a senior candidate does not automatically confer a right upon candidates lower in merit to claim such insider vacancy—Cadre allocation cannot be kept open indefinitely—Finality of allocation essential for stability in service administration. [Paras 4.1, 9, 11–12] B. Service Jurisprudence—Cadre Allocation—Delay and acquiescence—Effect—Challenge raised six years after 2004 selection held grossly belated—Appellant having accepted allocation and served in Tamil Nadu cadre for more than two decades—Doctrine of finality applies&mdash...
(6) SUPREME COURT
Rejection of plaint
A. Constitution of India—Article 227—Supervisory Jurisdiction of High Court—Scope and limitations—Power under Article 227 is supervisory and extraordinary—To be exercised sparingly and with judicial discipline—Not meant to function as appellate or revisional jurisdiction—High Court cannot invoke Article 227 to circumvent or supplant specific statutory remedies available under the Code of Civil Procedure—Availability of efficacious alternative remedy operates as a near total bar—Improper exercise of supervisory jurisdiction deprecated. [Paras 5, 5.1, 5.5–5.7, 7–9] B. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order VII Rule 11—Rejection of plaint—Availability of statutory remedy—Effect on Article 227 jurisdiction—Where CPC provides specific provision fo...
(7) SUPREME COURT
Arbitral award
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 29A(4) & (5)—Extension of mandate—Award rendered after expiry of statutory time—An application under Section 29A(5) seeking extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is maintainable even after the expiry of the periods prescribed under Sections 29A(1) and 29A(3) and even after an award is rendered in the interregnum—The statute does not prescribe any threshold bar against entertaining such an application post-award—Power and jurisdiction of the Court under Section 29A are not denuded by the arbitrator’s act of delivering an award without mandate. [Paras 1–2, 14–17, 21–23] B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 29A—Nature and effect of award passed without mandate—An arbitral award r...
(8) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 438—Anticipatory Bail—Grant of—Offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 5 of MPID Act, 1999—High Court rejected anticipatory bail—Supreme Court had granted interim protection—Investigation under IPC completed and charge-sheet filed—No charge-sheet filed under MPID Act—Accused cooperated with investigation—Interim protection made absolute—Anticipatory bail granted. [Paras 6–9, 11] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471—Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999—Sections 3, 4 & 5—Anticipatory Bail—Effect of filing of charge-sheet—Serious allegations of financial fraud and misappropriation&md...
(9) SUPREME COURT
Suspension of sentence
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 389—Suspension of Sentence—Pending Criminal Appeal—Conviction under Section 302 IPC and life imprisonment—Appellant undergone about fourteen years of actual incarceration—Appeal pending since 2016—Repeated rejection of suspension applications by High Court—Likelihood of inordinate delay in disposal of appeal—Long incarceration held to be a relevant and determinative factor—Refusal to suspend sentence held unjustified—Sentence suspended and bail granted pending appeal. [Paras 6–9, 11] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 498-A, 304-B—Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961—Sections 3 & 4—Suspension of Sentence—Principles governing—Seriousness of offence and nature of conviction not sole ba...
(10) SUPREME COURT
Bail
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Bail—Grant of Bail by Supreme Court—Interference with High Court order rejecting bail—Serious offences under IPC, Prevention of Corruption Act and Motor Vehicles Act—Appellants not principal offenders—Allegations primarily of post-occurrence conspiracy and evidence manipulation—Long incarceration up to about eighteen months—Large number of prosecution witnesses and likelihood of delay in trial—Continued detention held unjustified—High Court order rejecting bail set aside—Bail granted with stringent conditions. [Paras 7–12] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 201, 467, 468, 471, 120-B read with Section 34—Bail—Nature of allegations—Appellants neither named as perpetrators of accident nor accused of causin...
(1) TRIPURA
Electricity Act, 2003—S. 164—Telegraph Act, 1885—S. 16(3)—Compensation—Revisional jurisdiction—In proceedings for determination of compensation under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, as applicable by virtue of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the jurisdiction of the District Judge is confined to assessing actual damage caused, including loss of trees and diminution of land use—Compensation awarded towards speculative or notional loss of income from prospective commercial exploitation of land falls outside the permissible scope of such jurisdiction and is liable to be interfered with—The supervisory power of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is limited and can be exercised only in cases of patent perversity, gross miscarriage of justice, or flagrant...
(2) JHARKHAND
Condonation of delay
Limitation Act, 1963—Condonation of delay—State authorities—Letters Patent Appeal—The law of limitation applies equally to the State and its instrumentalities, and the Government cannot claim a separate or extended period of limitation on the ground of bureaucratic functioning—Administrative lethargy, procedural red tape, and unexplained movement of files at various levels do not constitute “sufficient cause” for condonation of inordinate delay—Courts have consistently cautioned against mechanically condoning delay merely because the State is the appellant, as such an approach would legitimise callous governance and erode the sanctity of limitation law—In the present case, a substantial delay of 289 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal remained inadequately explained, reflecting la...
(3) CALCUTTA
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955—S. 4C—West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953—Ss. 6(1)(b), 6(1)(c), 6(3)—Conversion of land—Status of applicant — Rejection of an application for conversion of land under Section 4C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 on the ground that the applicant was a lessee and not a raiyat was unsustainable—The petitioner owned 14.33 acres of land, which was within the permissible ceiling of 15 acres for retention of non-agricultural land under Section 6(1)(c) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953—Retention of land under Sections 6(1)(b) and 6(1)(c) operates automatically and takes effect from the date of vesting, without the necessity of any further order—Consequently, an order passed under Section 6(3) restricting use of a portion of the l...
(4) DELHI
Bail granted
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012—Age determination—Bail—Ss. 29, 30—In prosecutions under the POCSO Act, determination of the victim’s age assumes critical significance—Where bone ossification test is relied upon, the upper age indicated in the reference range must be considered for assessing minority—Though consent of a minor has no legal sanctity, the factual matrix—including the apparent maturity and intellectual capacity of the victim and existence of a consensual romantic relationship with the accused—may be relevant for the limited purpose of bail—The object of the Act is to shield children below 18 years from sexual exploitation and not to criminalise consensual romantic relationships between adolescents—At the post-charge stage, Section 29 elevat...
(5) DELHI
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Ss. 29, 34, 37—Constitution of India—Arts. 226, 227—Scope of judicial interference—Interlocutory orders of Arbitral Tribunal—Proceedings before an Arbitral Tribunal are subject to minimal judicial intervention, consistent with the legislative intent of expeditious dispute resolution—Interlocutory orders passed by the Tribunal in exercise of its procedural discretion—such as permitting or refusing production of documents, summoning of witnesses, or regulating evidence—are not amenable to challenge under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution, except in rare and exceptional circumstances—Parties are ordinarily required to await the final arbitral award, with grievances against procedural orders being raised, if permissible, in proceedings und...
(6) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Abetment of Suicide
Copyright Act, 1957—Section 14, 51—Infringement—Rights and Remedies A. Copyright Act, 1957—Section 14—Exclusive Rights—Copyright vests in the author of a literary, artistic, musical, or cinematographic work the exclusive right to reproduce, adapt, distribute, perform, or communicate the work to the public. (Para 2) B. Copyright Act, 1957—Section 51—Infringement—Unauthorized use of a copyrighted work, including reproduction, adaptation, sale, or public communication, constitutes infringement, regardless of intent. (Para 3) C. Copyright Act, 1957—Exceptions—Limited exceptions such as private study, research, criticism, review, and reporting of current events do not amount to infringement. (Para 4) D. Remedies—Civil remedies include injunction, damages, and a...
(7) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Copyright Act, 1957—Section 14, 51—Infringement—Exclusive Rights—Remedies A. Definition and Scope—Copyright grants the creator of a literary, artistic, musical, or cinematographic work exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, perform, or communicate the work to the public. (Sec. 14) B. Infringement—Any unauthorized use of a copyrighted work, including reproduction, adaptation, sale, or communication to the public, constitutes infringement. Innocent intention does not absolve liability. (Sec. 51) C. Exceptions and Fair Use—Certain uses, such as private study, research, criticism, or reporting, may not amount to infringement, provided they are within statutory exceptions. D. Remedies for Infringement—Civil remedies include injunction, damages, or accounts of profits; criminal rem...
(8) ALLAHABAD
A. Criminal Procedure Code—Police encounter—Compliance with Supreme Court guidelines—Reiteration of directions in PUCL v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 10 SCC 635—Mandatory registration of FIR in all cases of police encounters resulting in death or grievous injury—Independent investigation to be conducted by CID or by a team headed by an officer senior in rank to head of police team involved—Statement of injured person to be recorded before Magistrate or Medical Officer. (Paras 5, 6 & 13) B. Police conduct—Use of force—Unjustified firing—Infliction of firearm injuries below knee level for extraneous considerations such as career advancement or public image impermissible—Police cannot assume role of judiciary in punishing accused—Right to life and dignity under Art. 21 ...
(9) CALCUTTA
Statutory presumption
A. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Sections 138 & 139—Dishonour of cheque—Legally enforceable debt—Statutory presumption—Accused admitted issuance of cheque but pleaded that cheque was issued as security for a different transaction—Defence of cheque issued for security without cogent proof held untenable—Once execution of cheque admitted, presumption under Sections 118 and 139 operates—Absence of written loan agreement not fatal—Complainant established ingredients of Section 138 by oral and documentary evidence—Accused failed to rebut statutory presumption—Conviction upheld. [Paras 10 to 16, 29 to 30] B. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Demand notice—Service and compliance—Cheque dishonoured for insufficiency of funds—S...
(10) DELHI
Civil Suit For Recovery
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Section 96—Appeal against decree—Recovery suit based on promissory notes and cheques—Proof of execution—Suit for recovery of money decreed on basis of two promissory notes and five undated cheques—Promissory notes bearing signatures of deceased borrower—Defendants neither specifically pleaded forgery of handwriting/signatures nor led evidence to disprove execution—Plaintiff proved signatures by summoning bank record—Undated cheques, though not bills of exchange, held to possess corroborative evidentiary value—Trial Court rightly decreed recovery applying preponderance of probabilities—No infirmity in decree—Appeal dismissed. [Paras 18 to 24, 29] B. Evidence Act, 1872—Burden of proof—Denial of signatures—Failure t...
