slcdailylaw
  • Home
  • Topic Search
  • Advanced Search
  • Citation Search
  • Bookmarks
  • Login
  • Superme Court
  • High Courts
(1) SUPREME COURT
Appeal against acquittal

A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 498A—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 379—Murder—Cruelty—Dying declaration—Evidentiary value—Conviction based on reliable eyewitness testimony (daughter of deceased), corroborated by medical evidence and dying declaration—Dying declaration recorded with medical certification of fitness cannot be discarded merely due to extent of burn injuries or absence of nurse—Minor inconsistencies in testimonies or hospital records not sufficient to discredit otherwise cogent evidence—Evidence of doctors establishing consciousness of deceased prevails over contrary oral assertions—Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that accused poured kerosene and set deceased on fire—Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC upheld.&n...

Appeal dismissed
(2) SUPREME COURT
Summoning additional accused

A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 319—Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 307, 120-B—Summoning of additional accused—Scope and standard—Power under Section 319 CrPC is extraordinary and to be exercised sparingly—Standard required is “strong and cogent evidence” indicating involvement of proposed accused, though not proof beyond reasonable doubt—Trial Court erred in applying a higher threshold akin to final adjudication by undertaking detailed scrutiny of contradictions, plausibility and documentary aspects—At this stage, Court is not required to conduct a mini trial or determine credibility conclusively—Evidence of PW-1 (complainant) along with PW-6 and PW-7, taken cumulatively, sufficient to meet the threshold—Rejection of application set aside.&nbs...

Allowed
(3) SUPREME COURT
Contempt

A. Contempt/Compliance—Interpretation of Court orders—Scope of relief—Coal supply dispute— Supreme Court orders directing supply of coal “at current rate” for period of wrongful suspension—Dispute whether respondent entitled to monetary compensation or coal supply—Held, on a combined reading of earlier orders, relief granted was only supply of coal in lieu of compensation and not payment of monetary compensation—Parties cannot interpret orders to expand relief beyond what was granted—Compliance requires execution of Fuel Supply Agreement for supply of coal for suspended period in accordance with prevailing policy—Claim for ₹106 crore compensation rejected. (Paras 11–14) B. Enforcement of directions—Manner of compliance—Choice of “current pr...

Disposed of
(4) SUPREME COURT
Service Law

A. Constitution of India—Article 31B—Ninth Schedule—Judicial review—Recruitment examination—Correct answer to MCQ— Dispute as to whether laws in Ninth Schedule are immune from judicial review on ground of violation of fundamental rights—Conflicting legal position emerging from precedents including Kesavananda Bharati and I.R. Coelho—Held, while Ninth Schedule enjoys limited immunity, such immunity is not absolute and is subject to basic structure doctrine—Question involved complex constitutional interpretation and both options (“Ninth Schedule” and “None of the above”) could be reasonably justified—Candidates cannot be penalised for ambiguity in question—Both answers treated as correct. (Paras 10–11) B. Service Law—Recruitment&mda...

Appeal disposed of
(5) SUPREME COURT
NDPS, Bail granted

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 20(b)—Bail—Grant of— Appellant, a passenger in a truck from which 150 kg ganja was recovered, arrested and in custody since 25.03.2024—No material placed on record establishing nexus between appellant and contraband—Trial not substantially progressed and considerable delay likely with several witnesses yet to be examined—High Court rejected bail—Held, in the facts and circumstances, case for grant of bail made out—Impugned order set aside—Appellant directed to be released on bail subject to conditions to ensure presence, cooperation in trial, and non-interference with evidence or witnesses—Violation of conditions to entail cancellation of bail—Appeal allowed. ...

Appeal allowed
(6) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023—Section 438 (Anticipatory bail)—Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023—Sections 64(2)(m), 77, 331(4), 351(2)—Anticipatory bail—Grant of— Appellant apprehended arrest in connection with FIR alleging serious offences under BNS—High Court rejected anticipatory bail—Supreme Court granted interim protection subject to cooperation—Appellant cooperated with investigation and no charge-sheet filed—Held, in facts and circumstances, appellant entitled to anticipatory bail—Impugned order set aside—Directed that in the event of arrest, appellant be released on bail on furnishing cash security of ₹25,000 with sureties—Subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses and no contact with victim&md...

Appeal allowed
(7) SUPREME COURT
Acquittal

A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Sections 20, 50—Search and seizure—Compliance with statutory safeguards—Accused apprehended while carrying a bag allegedly containing 11 kg 50 g of charas—Trial Court convicted accused under Section 20 NDPS Act—High Court set aside conviction holding that provisions of Section 50 were not complied with—Investigating Officer gave the accused three options for search, including search before a police officer, whereas Section 50 mandates that the accused must be apprised only of the right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate—Providing a third option contrary to the statutory mandate vitiates the search and recovery—Non-compliance with Section 50 renders the recovery suspect and conviction unsustainable—Acqui...

Acquittal
(8) SUPREME COURT
Service Law

A. Service Law—Recruitment—Eligibility—Higher qualification—Whether exclusion permissible— Recruitment to the post of Supervisor (ICDS) from Anganwadi Workers under Special Rules for Kerala Social Welfare Subordinate Services—Rule provided 29% vacancies for Anganwadi Workers possessing SSLC with 10 years’ experience and additionally earmarked 11% vacancies for graduate Anganwadi Workers—Held, mere earmarking of 11% ratio for graduates does not exclude graduate Anganwadi Workers from competing in the 29% quota meant for Anganwadi Workers with SSLC and requisite experience—Higher qualification cannot operate as a disqualification unless the rule expressly provides exclusion—Graduates possessing SSLC and requisite experience remain eligible to apply under the 29% quota as well&mdash...

Appeal allowed
(9) SUPREME COURT
Compensation

A. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Section 166—Motor accident compensation—Deduction of benefits received under employer’s group insurance—Permissibility—Tribunal deducted amounts received by claimants under employer-provided group insurance while determining compensation—High Court set aside such deduction and awarded full compensation—Held, benefits received by dependants under group insurance or employer-provided schemes arise from an independent contractual relationship and do not have a direct nexus with the statutory compensation payable under the Motor Vehicles Act—Such amounts cannot be treated as “pecuniary advantages” liable for deduction—Principle of balancing loss and gain cannot be invoked to reduce statutory compensation—High Court rightly disallowed dedu...

Appeal dismissed
(10) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail

A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 438—Anticipatory bail—Grant of—FIR registered under Sections 328, 376, 406 and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860—High Court rejected anticipatory bail—Supreme Court granted interim protection during pendency of appeal—Appellant contended that relationship between parties was consensual, that he had cooperated with investigation and appeared before the Trial Court after filing of charge-sheet—Held, considering the circumstances and cooperation with investigation, appellant entitled to relief under Section 438 CrPC—Impugned order of High Court set aside and anticipatory bail granted in the event of arrest. (Paras 4–7) B. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 438—Anticipatory bail—Conditions—While granting anti...

Bail Granted
(1) BOMBAY

The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, an employee who completes the prescribed probation period is deemed to have acquired permanency—In this case, an Assistant Teacher was orally terminated without notice or an opportunity of hearing, which amounted to a violation of the principles of natural justice—Evidence such as the seniority list and inspection reports established that the teacher had rendered continuous service and had attained deemed permanency—The School Tribunal therefore ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits—The matter was earlier remanded by the High Court for fresh consideration due to denial of hearing—However, despite receiving notice and multiple opportunities, the management failed to participate in th...

Dismissed
(2) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Bail

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Sections 18 and 37 impose strict conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotic substances—Section 37 makes bail difficult because the court must be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and will not commit any offence while on bail—However, courts have recognized that the right to a speedy trial, which forms part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be ignored—In cases of prolonged delay in trial and extended incarceration, continued detention may violate the accused’s fundamental rights—The court held that excessive pre-trial imprisonment effectively becomes punitive rather than preventive—Therefore, the strict rigors of Section 37 may be diluted when the trial is unduly delayed—Accordingly,...

(3) CALCUTTA

A. Administrative Law—Blacklisting—Petitioners banned from carrying out fumigation treatments under NSPMs-12 and 22 without prior notice or hearing—Clause 2.5 of NSPM-12 requires issuance of show cause notice and suspension thrice within five years before blacklisting—No suspension recorded for petitioners—Held, blacklisting order quashed for violation of natural justice and statutory guidelines. [Paras 5, 15, 28–29] B. Criminal Law—Presumption of innocence—Petitioners involved in ongoing criminal proceedings—Court held that presumption of innocence applies until guilt is proven after proper trial—Blacklisting based solely on allegations without adjudication impermissible. [Paras 17, 19, 28] C. Principles of Natural Justice—Blacklisting and banning without fair hearin...

(4) BOMBAY

A. Employees Compensation Act, 1923—Sections 2(1)(d), 4, and 8—Dependents and legal heirs—Original claimant deceased during pendency of proceedings—Claim initiated by deceased dependent survives and may be continued by legal representatives or heirs—Legal heirs need not independently qualify as dependents to be impleaded and pursue the claim. [Paras 12–18] B. Employees Compensation Act, 1923—Sections 4 and 8—Welfare legislation—Objective to provide financial relief for employment-related accidents—Claim should not extinguish merely due to claimant’s death during pendency—Legal representatives permitted to step into claimant’s place to ensure justice and fulfill purpose of Act. [Paras 19] C. Employees Compensation Act, 1923—Sections 2(1)(d), 4, and 8&...

(5) BOMBAY

A. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947—Sections 10(1)(c), 12(5), 25B and 25F—Workman entitled to protection against illegal termination—Petitioner employed as sweeper for over 11 years, alleged payment below minimum wages, harassment, and termination without notice or retrenchment compensation—Reference made by Deputy Commissioner of Labour for adjudication of reinstatement and back wages. [Paras 2–4, 11–14] B. Evidence and burden of proof—Muster rolls, salary vouchers, duty list, and oral testimony produced as secondary evidence—Labour Court allowed reliance on such evidence, drawing adverse inference against respondent for non-production of records—Respondent denied employer-employee relationship; court held existence of employment relationship established on preponderance of probabilit...

(6) BOMBAY

A. Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952—Section 8F—Recovery from third parties—Third party filed affidavit denying liability under Section 8F(3)(vi)—Held, statutory protection afforded to such affidavit—Authority cannot compel payment unless it proves that the sworn statement was false in a material particular—Burden of proof lies on the authority; suspicion alone insufficient. [Paras 19–21] B. Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952—Section 8F—Recovery from third parties—Authority must demonstrate that third party either owes money to employer or holds money for/on behalf of employer—Legal relationship under which funds are held must be real and identifiable—Recovery cannot be based solely on suspicion. ...

(7) CALCUTTA

A. Commercial Courts Act, 2015—Section 2(1)(c)(vii)—Commercial dispute—Suit arising out of agreement concerning immovable property used exclusively for trade or commerce—Plaintiff acknowledged existence of registered lease deed and accepted rent/occupation charges after expiry of lease—Issue involved interpretation of lease deed and jural relationship between parties—Held, suit qualifies as commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(vii). [Paras 18, 24–29] B. Transfer of Property Act, 1882—Section 106—Lease agreement post notice under Section 106—Determination of jural relationship between landlord and tenant—Plaintiff claimed eviction of defendants as trespassers but referred to registered lease deed—Held, lease agreement must be interpreted to decide nature of rela...

Disposed of
(8) CALCUTTA

A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 34—Challenge to arbitral award—Tribunal relied on personal knowledge and expertise instead of material evidence—Held, such reliance violates fundamental policy of Indian law and principles of natural justice—Arbitral tribunal must adjudicate solely on evidence produced by parties and in accordance with contract terms. [Paras 17–59] B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 18—Equal treatment of parties—Tribunal applied double standards by accepting appellant’s pre-retrieval reports and discarding respondent’s post-retrieval reports without valid justification—Delay in producing reports corresponded with retrieval of Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)—Violation of Section 18 observed. [Paras 61–71] C....

(9) CHHATTISGARH

A. Administrative Law—Canal Construction and Technical Expertise—Challenge to the alignment and execution of a canal project under the Rajeev Gandhi Sanwardhan Scheme was raised by appellants, contending that the project adversely affected them—The Court held that determination of whether the canal should follow a straight or curved alignment falls within the domain of technical experts—In the absence of arbitrariness, mala fide intent, or illegality, judicial interference is not warranted—The Detailed Project Report (DPR) was prepared following proper technical assessment and approved by competent authorities—The appellants failed to demonstrate any infringement of their fundamental rights—The dismissal of the writ petition by the Single Judge was upheld. [Paras 7–8] B. Administrative L...

(10) CHHATTISGARH

A. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 226—Judicial review of tender process—Rejection of technical bid for non-compliance with prescribed format for Pre-Contract Integrity Pact—Tender authority entitled to insist on strict adherence to terms and conditions of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT)—Rejection not arbitrary or irrational; court’s review limited to arbitrariness, mala fide, or discriminatory decisions. B. Government Order dated 27.11.2014—Tender process—Clause (iv) addresses scenario where multiple bids are received but only one qualifies technically—Such situation does not amount to a "single tender"—Financial bid of technically qualified bidder can be opened and considered—Award of work to sole qualified bidder held valid and not contrary to government or...

slcdailylaw

Tomar Publication

561, Sec-2, Jagriti Vihar, Meerut-250004

0121 3561932, +91 9458 5523 61

tomarpublication999@gmail.com

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

© SLC Daily law all right reserved.

Cookies Required

Please enable cookies in your browser settings to continue.