(1) SUPREME COURT
Rejection of plaint
A. Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Sections 222 and 276 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Article 137 — Probate petition — Limitation — No specific period of limitation is prescribed for filing an application for probate under the Indian Succession Act — Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies — Right to apply for probate is a continuing right and does not necessarily accrue on the death of the testator — Limitation begins when it becomes necessary to seek probate, such as when the Will is disputed or hostile claims are asserted — Delay from the date of death alone does not render the petition time-barred. (Paras 3 to 6) B. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order VII Rule 11(d) — Rejection of plaint/petition — Scope — While deciding an application under Order VII ...
(2) SUPREME COURT
Second appeal
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial question of law — Formulation of substantial question of law is a mandatory precondition for hearing and deciding a second appeal — Failure of the High Court to formulate such question(s) before adjudicating the appeal renders the judgment legally unsustainable and liable to be set aside. (Paras 16 to 24) B. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 68 — Registered sale deed — Proof of execution — Section 68 applies only to documents which are required by law to be attested — A registered sale deed is not a document which the law mandates to be attested — Consequently, its execution need not be proved by examining an attesting witness under Section 68, and the proviso relating to specific denial of execu...
(3) SUPREME COURT
Agreement to Sell
A. Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Section 23 — Agreement to Sell — Specific performance — Agreement contained a clause providing for refund of earnest money in the event of failure to execute the sale deed — Effect — Held, such a clause merely secures the minimum entitlement of the purchaser in the event of breach and does not confer upon the vendor an option to avoid performance by refunding the earnest money — Unless the agreement expressly provides that payment of the stipulated amount is in substitution of performance, the purchaser's remedy of specific performance remains available. (Paras 16 to 21) B. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Scope — High Court cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless such findings are shown to be ...
(4) SUPREME COURT
Second appeal
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Scope of interference by High Court — Trial Court dismissed the suit upon appreciation of evidence — First Appellate Court reversed the well-reasoned findings without satisfactorily determining the identity of the disputed property or the legality of the rectification deed — High Court mechanically affirmed the appellate judgment without addressing these substantial issues — Held, the High Court failed to exercise jurisdiction under Section 100 in accordance with law and its judgment is liable to be set aside. (Paras 38 to 43) B. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 43 — Doctrine of feeding the grant by estoppel — Applicability — Doctrine can operate only when the identity of the property forming the subje...
(5) SUPREME COURT
Arbitration
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 5, 16, 34 and 37 — Constitution of India — Article 227 — Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court — Scope — Interference with arbitral proceedings — Held, High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 in arbitration matters is extremely limited and can be exercised only in exceptional cases where there is a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction — Orders of the Arbitral Tribunal rejecting objections under Section 16 are ordinarily challengeable only under Section 34 after the final award — High Court erred in entertaining the petition under Article 227 and staying the arbitral proceedings. (Paras 25 to 33) B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 16 and 34 — Kompetenz-Kompetenz doctrine — Arbitral Tribu...
(6) SUPREME COURT
A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 364, 386, 364 read with 120-B and 34—Arms Act, 1959—Sections 4 and 25—Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act)—Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(iv)—Suspension of sentence pending appeal—Long incarceration—Where appellant was convicted under provisions of IPC, MCOC Act and Arms Act and had undergone incarceration for more than 18 years, held, considering the prolonged custody and pendency of appeal, substantive sentence was liable to be suspended pending final disposal of appeal—Appellant directed to be released on bail subject to terms and conditions imposed by the Trial Court. (Paras 8 to 11) B. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 389—Suspension of sentence—Consideration of prolonged incarceration—Held, w...
(7) SUPREME COURT
Bail
A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 307, 427, 294, 506, 323, 147, 149, 452, 458 and 460—Bail—Regular Bail—Subsequent implication of accused—Where appellants were arrested in connection with FIR registered for offences under Sections 302, 307, 427, 294, 506, 323, 147, 149, 452, 458 and 460 IPC, were not named in the original FIR and were implicated only through supplementary charge-sheet, and no specific overt act or allegation was attributed against them, held, continued incarceration pending trial was not warranted—Appellants directed to be released on bail subject to terms and conditions imposed by the Trial Court. (Paras 2 to 5) B. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Bail Jurisprudence—Long incarceration and absence of specific allegations—Consideration for grant of bail—...
(8) SUPREME COURT
Suspension of sentence
A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 389(1)—Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 364, 404, 120-B read with 34—Arms Act, 1959—Section 25(1-B)(B)—Suspension of sentence pending appeal—Parity with co-convict—Where appellant was convicted for offences including murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, and his appeal against conviction was pending before the High Court, held, though suspension of sentence in cases involving life imprisonment requires strong and exceptional grounds, the appellant was entitled to similar relief as an identically placed co-convict whose substantive sentence had already been suspended by the High Court and who was released on bail—State having not challenged the said order for more than one year, parity was required to be maintai...
(9) SUPREME COURT
Arrest
A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Sections 200, 202 and 87—Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 498A and 323—Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961—Sections 3 and 4—Complaint case—Anticipatory bail—Apprehension of arrest—Where appellant apprehended arrest in a complaint case registered for offences under Sections 498A and 323 IPC read with Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, on the ground that he was declared proclaimed offender, held, once cognizance is taken by Magistrate in a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC and process is issued, ordinarily the accused is required only to appear before the Court and participate in proceedings—Police has no authority to arrest an accused in a complaint case unless a warrant is issued by the Court in accordance with Section 87 CrPC—De...
(10) SUPREME COURT
Bail
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 167(2)—Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023—Sections 61(2), 111(1), 111(3), 111(4), 318(1), 336, 338 and 340—Madhya Pradesh Protection of Depositors’ Interests Act, 2000—Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019—Default bail—Computation of statutory period—Production of accused already in judicial custody in another case—Where the petitioners, arrested in connection with an FIR registered under the aforesaid provisions, contended that they were first produced before the Sessions Court on 27.01.2025 pursuant to a production warrant and that the charge-sheet was not filed within ninety days thereof, while the Sessions Court rejected their application for default bail on the ground that they had not actually been produced on the said date des...
(4) MADHYA PRADESH
Maintenance, Jurisdiction
A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 125—Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956—Section 20(3)—Maintenance—Major unmarried daughter—Merely because an application for maintenance by a major unmarried daughter was filed under Section 125 CrPC instead of Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, relief cannot be denied where the Court otherwise possesses the jurisdiction to grant such relief—The Family Court, being competent to entertain proceedings under both enactments, rightly awarded interim maintenance, and no interference was called for. (Paras 6, 8, 9 and 15) B. Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956—Section 20(3)—Maintenance of major unmarried daughter—The statutory requirement for claiming maintenance under Section 20(3) is that the majo...
(6) DELHI
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 9—Interim measures—Dispute arising out of licence agreement—Where the petitioner challenged a demand notice raising concession fee on the ground that the respondent had unilaterally increased the number of train coaches contrary to the terms of the licence agreement, the Court held that an arbitrable dispute existed between the parties and directed that the disputes be resolved through arbitration. (Paras 3, 5 to 8, 11 and 13) B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Sections 9 and 11—Arbitration agreement—Appointment of Arbitrator—In view of the arbitration clause contained in the licence agreement and the existence of disputes relating to the validity of the demand notice and enhancement of concession fee, the Court appointed a Sole Arb...
(7) DELHI
Dishonour of cheque, Demand notice, Statutory notice
A. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Dishonour of cheque—Statutory demand notice—Validity—A statutory notice under Section 138 must relate to a legally enforceable debt or liability—Mere demand of an amount less than the aggregate cheque amount on account of admitted part-payments does not, by itself, render the notice invalid, where the notice discloses the basis of computation—Whether the amount demanded represents the legally enforceable debt is a matter to be determined on evidence during trial and not in revisional jurisdiction. (Paras 25, 35, 37 and 40) B. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Dishonour of cheque—Demand notice—Validity—The Sessions Court erred in holding the statutory notice invalid solely because the amount demanded was low...
(8) DELHI
Bail Application
A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 37—Bail—Commercial quantity—In offences involving commercial quantity of narcotic drugs, bail can be granted only after the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Public Prosecutor. B. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 50—Constitution of India, 1950—Article 22(1)—Grounds of arrest—The arrested person must be informed of the grounds of arrest to enable an effective defence—No particular format is prescribed, and substantial compliance with the statutory and constitutional requirement is sufficient unless prejudice is demonstrate...
(10) DELHI
A. Specific Relief Act, 1963—Specific performance—Readiness and willingness—In a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff must establish continuous readiness and willingness to perform the essential terms of the contract from the date of its execution till the date of hearing—Financial capacity to perform the contract must be proved by cogent evidence, and mere pleadings or bald assertions are insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement. (Paras 85 to 87, 92 and 99) B. Limitation Act, 1963—Section 3—Specific performance—Limitation—A suit for specific performance must be instituted within the prescribed period of limitation—Where the cause of action is dependent upon the conclusion of pending litigation, limitation commences upon the expiry of the stipulated period after dis...
