slcdailylaw
  • Home
  • Topic Search
  • Advanced Search
  • Citation Search
  • Bookmarks
  • Login
  • Superme Court
  • High Courts
(1) SUPREME COURT
Land acquisition

A. Land Acquisition Act, 1894—Section 5A—Opportunity of hearing—Compliance—Held: The requirement of affording an opportunity of hearing under Section 5A is satisfied where the Land Acquisition Officer provides adequate opportunity to the landowners to file and pursue their objections. The doctrine of substantial compliance applies where the objectors were heard on several occasions but failed to diligently pursue the proceedings after remaining absent on a subsequent date. In the absence of mala fides or any deliberate denial of hearing by the Land Acquisition Officer, the acquisition proceedings cannot be invalidated on the ground of non-compliance with Section 5A. The Division Bench rightly reversed the judgment of the Single Judge, and the appeals were dismissed. (Paras 42 to 54) B. Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

(2) SUPREME COURT

A. Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992—Sections 15D(b) and 15HB—Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996—Regulation 33(4)—Close-ended mutual fund schemes—Redemption at maturity—Held: Redemption of units of a close-ended mutual fund scheme upon its maturity is mandatory unless the scheme is validly rolled over after making the requisite disclosures to the unitholders and SEBI in accordance with the Regulations. Extension of the maturity of underlying securities beyond the scheme's maturity period without complying with the prescribed procedure constitutes a violation of Regulation 33(4) and attracts regulatory consequences. (Paras 23 to 35) B. Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992—Sections 15D(b) and 15HB—Asset Management Companies...

(3) SUPREME COURT
Service Law

A. CSIR Scientists Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2001—Rule 7.6—Assessment for promotion—Annual Performance Reports (APRs)/Performance Mapping Scheme (PMS) and Work Report—Held: The Assessment Committee is required to consider both the APRs/PMS and the Work Report while assessing suitability for promotion. However, neither Rule 7.6 nor Paragraph 3(b) of the Circular dated 01.06.2011 mandates averaging of APR/PMS scores with the Work Report score. Determination of suitability and award of marks fall within the exclusive domain of the expert Assessment Committee. (Paras 24 to 31) B. Service Law—Promotion—Judicial review—Expert Assessment Committee—Held: In the absence of allegations of mala fides, violation of statutory rules or procedural irregularity, Courts cannot substitute their own ...

Appeal allowed
(4) SUPREME COURT
Suspension of sentence

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 376(1)—Suspension of sentence pending appeal—Bail—Where the petitioner was convicted under Section 376(1) IPC and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, had undergone about three years and six months of custody, the sentence imposed was a fixed-term sentence, the appeal before the High Court was likely to take considerable time for disposal, and a prima facie assessment of the prosecutrix's testimony indicated that the appeal raised arguable issues, the Supreme Court suspended the sentence pending disposal of the criminal appeal and directed the release of the petitioner on bail. (Paras 2 to 7) ...

(5) SUPREME COURT

Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956—Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7—Bail—Long incarceration—Manager of premises—Where the petitioner, accused of offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, had remained in custody for about one year and one month, claimed to be merely the manager and not the principal accused, the offences were triable by a Magistrate, and the trial was likely to take considerable time, the petitioner was held entitled to bail—High Court order refusing bail set aside—Petitioner directed to be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. (Paras 2 to 7) ...

(6) SUPREME COURT
Life imprisonment

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 323, 395, 396 and 452—Conviction—Dacoity with murder—Life imprisonment—Remission—Interim bail—Where the convictions and sentences imposed for offences under Sections 452, 395, 396 IPC (and Section 323 IPC in one appeal) were affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court found no ground to interfere on merits, the criminal appeals were dismissed—However, considering that the appellants had undergone more than fourteen years and twenty years of incarceration respectively, liberty was granted to apply for remission under the applicable statutory provisions and prevailing remission policy—Competent authority directed to decide the remission applications within three months, uninfluenced by the dismissal of the appeals and keeping in view the directions i...

Appeal dismissed
(7) SUPREME COURT
Bail

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471—Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022—Sections 7 and 8—Information Technology Act, 2000—Sections 66C and 66D—Bail—Parity—Where the petitioner, accused of offences relating to cheating, forgery, conspiracy, online gambling and identity fraud, had remained in custody for about ten months, the offences were triable by a Magistrate, and identically placed co-accused had already been enlarged on bail by the Supreme Court, the petitioner was held entitled to bail on the ground of parity—High Court order refusing bail set aside—Petitioner directed to be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the competent Court. (Paras 2 to 7) ...

Bail Granted
(8) SUPREME COURT
Discharge, POCSO

A. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012—Sections 19(1) and 21—Failure to report sexual assault of a child—Interpretation of "knowledge"—Held: The expression "knowledge" in Section 19(1) includes awareness derived from credible information directly received from the child victim. The duty to report under Section 21 is attracted even where the person has not personally witnessed the offence, provided the victim has directly disclosed the commission of the offence. Immediate reporting is mandatory to protect the child and preserve evidence. (Paras 45 to 56) B. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012—Section 21(3)—Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 176—Failure to report—Liability—Held: Minor children, including the victim's siste...

Appeal allowed
(9) SUPREME COURT
Multiple FIR

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 406 and 420—Multiple FIRs—Identical allegations—Clubbing of FIRs and joint investigation—Interim protection from arrest—Where the petitioner was named in several FIRs containing substantially identical allegations of inducing investments in group companies and misappropriating investors' funds, and had sought clubbing of the FIRs and a joint investigation, while similarly placed co-accused had already been granted interim protection by the High Court, the Supreme Court issued notice and granted interim protection—Directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with any FIR containing allegations identical to those in FIR No. 4 of 2022, subject to the condition that he shall cooperate with the investigation. (Paras 1 to 5) ...

(10) SUPREME COURT

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 324 and 34—Special Leave Petition—Exemption from surrender—Murder and voluntarily causing hurt with common intention—Where the petitioner was convicted under Sections 302/324/34 IPC and the conviction had been affirmed by the High Court, the Supreme Court rejected the prayer seeking exemption from surrender, holding that no case for such relief was made out in view of the subsisting conviction—Petitioner directed to surrender before the concerned Court within four weeks and file a surrender certificate before the next date of hearing. (Paras 1 to 5) ...

(1) MADHYA PRADESH {INDORE BENCH}
Rejection of plaint

A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order VI Rule 17 & Order VII Rule 11—Amendment and rejection of plaint—Where an application for amendment of the plaint seeks to cure defects relied upon in an application for rejection of the plaint, the amendment application ought ordinarily to be decided first—Rejection of the plaint without considering the pending amendment application is unsustainable. B. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order VII Rule 11—Rejection of plaint—Fraud—A plaint alleging that execution of a sale deed was procured by fraud, deception and false promises regarding payment of consideration discloses a triable cause of action—Such allegations cannot be rejected at the threshold merely on the basis of recitals in the sale deed, and the plaint must be read as a whole. C. Trans...

Allowed
(2) DELHI
Bail Application

A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 37—Bail—Commercial quantity—In offences involving commercial quantity of narcotic drugs, bail can be granted only after the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the Public Prosecutor. B. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 50—Constitution of India, 1950—Article 22(1)—Grounds of arrest—The arrested person must be informed of the grounds of arrest to enable an effective defence—No particular format is prescribed, and substantial compliance with the statutory and constitutional requirement is sufficient unless prejudice is demonstrate...

Allowed
(3) JHARKHAND
Hostile witness

A. Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)—Sections 302, 304 Part II, 300 & 299—Murder v. culpable homicide not amounting to murder—Appellant assaulted deceased with a bamboo strip in an intoxicated state after refusal to supply liquor—No premeditation or deadly weapon used, and deceased succumbed to injuries two days later during treatment—Held, circumstances disclosed knowledge that death was likely, but not intention to cause death or such bodily injury as was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death—Conviction altered from S. 302 IPC to S. 304 Part II IPC—Convictions under Ss. 323 and 341 IPC affirmed—Sentence reduced to period already undergone. B. Evidence Act, 1872—Hostile witness—Evidentiary value—Testimony of hostile witnesses not liable to be rejected in t...

Disposed of
(4) JHARKHAND
Service Law

A. Service Law—Regularization—Casual/Part-Time Labourers—Educational qualification—Petitioners engaged as Part-Time Casual Labourers sought regularization under the CBIC Part Time Casual Labourers (Regularization) Scheme, 2020—Claim rejected for lack of prescribed matriculation qualification—Held, after abolition of Group-D posts, regularization could only be against Group-C posts requiring matriculation as the minimum eligibility—Absence of essential educational qualification constituted an incurable defect affecting eligibility, rendering appointment illegal and not merely irregular—Tribunal rightly declined regularization. B. Service Law—Illegal and irregular appointments—Distinction—Appointment made without possessing the prescribed educational qualification held to ...

Disposed of
(5) JHARKHAND

A. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Section 9—Restitution of conjugal rights—Proof of marriage and withdrawal from society—Wife established marriage through oral evidence corroborated by public documents including voter lists, Aadhaar card and voter ID showing husband as spouse—Husband's complete denial of marriage unsupported by credible evidence—Held, documentary evidence, though not conclusive, constituted reliable corroborative proof—Decree for restitution rightly granted. B. Evidence—Appreciation of evidence—Wife's testimony regarding cohabitation and subsequent expulsion on account of husband's illicit relationship supported by independent witnesses—Husband failed to rebut evidence by any convincing material—Findings held based on proper appreciation of evidenc...

Disposed of
(6) JHARKHAND

A. Penal Code, 1860—Sections 307, 353 & 412/34—Arms Act, 1959—Sections 25(1-B), 26 & 27—Criminal Law Amendment Act—Section 17—Conviction—Mere presence of the accused at the place of encounter and her marital relationship with a co-accused extremist, without proof of any overt act, conscious possession of arms, or active participation in the unlawful activities of the banned organisation, held insufficient to sustain conviction. B. Criminal Trial—Appreciation of evidence—Conviction cannot rest on suspicion, association or relationship alone—Prosecution must establish active involvement and guilt beyond reasonable doubt through reliable evidence. C. Evidence—Improvement in testimony—Material improvements made by a prosecution witness during cross-examinati...

(7) JHARKHAND
Murder, Culpable homicide

A. Penal Code, 1860—Section 304 Part II—Culpable homicide not amounting to murder—Conviction sustained where death was caused by fist blows resulting in rupture of the spleen and laceration of the lung—Internal injuries established that the accused had knowledge that the assault was likely to cause death, attracting Section 304 Part II IPC. B. Evidence—Ocular and medical evidence—Credible eyewitness testimony, duly corroborated by medical evidence and the deceased's oral dying declaration to family members, held sufficient to establish the prosecution case—Absence of external injuries not fatal where internal injuries clearly established the cause of death. C. Criminal Trial—Delay in lodging FIR—Delay of three days in registration of the FIR satisfactorily explained by attemp...

Appeal dismissed
(8) JHARKHAND

A. Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908—Section 71-A—Restoration proceedings—Restoration application instituted after an inordinate delay of about forty years from the original transaction held not maintainable, the power under Section 71-A being required to be exercised within a reasonable period. B. Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908—Section 71-A—Constructive res judicata—A second restoration proceeding filed after an earlier restoration case had attained finality, without challenging the earlier order, is barred by the principle of constructive res judicata and cannot be entertained. C. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 226—Writ of certiorari—High Court may interfere with concurrent appellate and revisional orders where material questions relating to limitation and constructive res ju...

Disposed of
(9) JHARKHAND

A. Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949—Sections 4(ix), 5 & 6—"Khas" and "Pradhani" villages—Classification of a village as "Khas" or "Pradhani" depends upon its existing statutory status and whether a hereditary headman is in office for the time being—Historical existence of a hereditary Pradhan alone does not permanently determine the character of the village. B. Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949—Appointment of Pradhan—Where no hereditary succession took place after the death of the last hereditary Pradhan and official records consistently treated the village as a "Khas" village for several decades, a subsequent claim of hereditary succession cannot revive "Pradhani" status. C. He...

Disposed of
(10) JHARKHAND
Abetment of Suicide

A. Penal Code, 1860—Section 306—Abetment of suicide—Ingredients—Mere matrimonial discord, allegations of extra-marital relationship, or breach of a promise to improve marital conduct do not by themselves constitute abetment of suicide—Prosecution must prove intentional instigation, active aid, or creation of circumstances leaving the deceased with no reasonable alternative except suicide, with a proximate nexus to the act. B. Penal Code, 1860—Section 306—Appreciation of evidence—Evidence showing continued marital and parental relationship, deceased's serious medical condition, and prior suicide attempt failed to establish that the accused's conduct directly drove the deceased to commit suicide—Essential ingredients of abetment not proved. C. Criminal Appeal—Acquitta...

slcdailylaw

Tomar Publication

561, Sec-2, Jagriti Vihar, Meerut-250004

0121 3561932, +91 9458 5523 61

tomarpublication999@gmail.com

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

© SLC Daily law all right reserved.

Cookies Required

Please enable cookies in your browser settings to continue.