(1) SUPREME COURT
Service Law
Service Law—Recruitment examination—Interim directions—Modification of order—Where earlier interim order permitting similarly placed candidates to participate in examination leads to practical and logistical difficulties, Court may modify such order to restrict relief to the concerned applicant only—Interim relief granted without creating any equity and subject to outcome of pending proceedings before High Court—Rights of parties kept open and unaffected by such interim directions. [Paras 2, 3] ...
(2) SUPREME COURT
Bail granted
Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 307, 120B, 147, 148, 149, 323—Arms Act, 1959—Sections 4, 25—Bail—Long incarceration—Delay in trial—Parity—Where accused has undergone prolonged incarceration (over eight years), trial has not commenced and is likely to be delayed with numerous witnesses to be examined, continued detention is unjustified—Parity with co-accused already granted bail is a relevant consideration—Bail granted without expressing opinion on merits, subject to conditions ensuring presence, non-interference with witnesses and cooperation in trial, with liberty to cancel bail in case of violation. [Paras 10, 11] ...
(3) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023—Section 482—Penal Code, 1860—Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B—Anticipatory bail—Grant—Interim protection—Where interim protection from arrest has been granted and the accused has cooperated with the investigation, and considering overall circumstances, anticipatory bail may be granted by making interim order absolute—Order rejecting anticipatory bail set aside—Relief granted subject to conditions including furnishing security, cooperation in investigation, and non-interference with witnesses, with liberty to cancel bail in case of violation. [Paras 8, 9, 10] ...
(4) SUPREME COURT
Second appeal
A. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Section 100—Constitution of India—Article 136—Second appeal—Concurrent findings—Interference—High Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC, cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless such findings are perverse, based on no evidence, or suffer from legal infirmity—Reappreciation of evidence is impermissible—Supreme Court also ordinarily does not interfere under Article 136 in absence of manifest illegality or miscarriage of justice. [Paras 31, 54, 55] B. Waqf Act, 1995—Sections 3(i), 32(2)(g)—Office of Sajjadanashin vis-à-vis Mutawalli—Jurisdiction—Sajjadanashin is a spiritual office concerned with religious and spiritual affairs of a Dargah, whereas Mutawalli performs administrative ...
(5) SUPREME COURT
Contempt of Court
A. Contempt of Courts Act, 1971—Section 2(c)—Constitution of India, 1950—Articles 129, 142—Criminal contempt—Protection of judicial officers—Gherao and obstruction of judicial officers discharging court-assigned duties amounts to a direct challenge to authority of Court and constitutes criminal contempt—Acts creating fear, intimidation or obstruction in discharge of judicial functions cannot be tolerated—Court bound to protect dignity and functioning of judiciary. [Paras 9, 10, 11] B. Administrative Law—Failure of State machinery—Law and order—Accountability—Inaction and delay by civil and police administration in responding to serious law and order situation involving judicial officers is deplorable—Authorities duty-bound to act promptly to ensure safet...
(6) SUPREME COURT
Contract Law
A. Contract Law—Administrative Law—Government contracts—Termination—Judicial review—Termination of contract based on findings of negligence and breach of contractual obligations is sustainable where supported by material and due consideration—Judicial review limited to examining legality, rationality and proportionality—Termination upheld when decision is neither arbitrary nor violative of due process. [Paras 2, 15, 25] B. Administrative Law—Blacklisting—Principles of natural justice—Show cause notice—Blacklisting, being stigmatic and having severe civil consequences, requires strict adherence to principles of natural justice—Specific and unambiguous show cause notice indicating intent to blacklist is mandatory—Failure to provide adequate notice and appl...
(7) SUPREME COURT
Service Law
A. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 14—Service Law—Disciplinary proceedings—Quantum of punishment—Judicial review—Courts in judicial review cannot ordinarily interfere with punishment imposed by disciplinary authority unless it is shockingly disproportionate, irrational or perverse—Scope limited to examining decision-making process and not substituting penalty—Interference permissible only in rare cases where punishment shocks conscience. [Paras 9, 10, 17] B. Service Law—Parity in punishment—Co-delinquents— Doctrine of parity does not apply mechanically—Higher-ranking अधिकारी entrusted with greater responsibility can be subjected to stricter punishment than co-delinquents of lower rank—Difference in status, role and degree of accountabil...
(8) SUPREME COURT
Cancellation of bail
A. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016—Companies Act, 2013—Section 185—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Bail—Conditions—Violation—Cancellation— Where accused failed to comply with conditions imposed while granting bail, including obligation to settle claims of allottees and refrain from similar conduct, and continued to indulge in acts such as non-completion of project, fabrication of documents and siphoning of funds, such conduct disentitles him from relief—Bail liable to be cancelled for breach of conditions and abuse of concession. [Paras 4, 6, 53, 125] B. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016—Companies Act, 2013—Section 185—Siphoning of funds—Moratorium period—Transfer of substantial funds (₹74 crores) to connected entities during moratorium p...
(9) SUPREME COURT
Succession Certificate, Decree
A. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Order IX Rule 13—Indian Succession Act, 1925—Sections 372, 383—Ex parte order—Minor—Non-impleadment—Ex parte order granting succession certificate liable to be set aside where minor legal heir was not impleaded and no guardian was appointed—Minor cannot be expected to act on public notice or defend proceedings—Non-impleadment and suppression of material facts vitiate proceedings—Application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC maintainable. [Paras 8, 9, 10] B. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Order IX Rule 13—Scope—Sufficient cause—Jurisdiction under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is wide and distinct from appeal—Applicant can establish sufficient cause for non-appearance—Where party was legally incapacitated (minor) and denie...
(10) SUPREME COURT
Service Law
A. Service Law—Departmental enquiry—Principles of natural justice—Requirement of oral enquiry—Where charges are denied by delinquent employee, it is mandatory for employer to conduct proper oral enquiry by leading evidence and examining witnesses—Failure to examine any witness or to afford opportunity of cross-examination vitiates enquiry—Department must prove charges unless clearly admitted—Enquiry conducted without oral evidence held invalid. [Paras 14, 17, 18] B. Service Rules—Burden of proof—Admission—Evasive or non-specific denial of charges in disciplinary proceedings does not amount to admission—Departmental charge-sheet is not akin to pleadings in civil suit—Unless there is clear and categorical admission, burden lies on employer to prove charges by le...
(1) TRIPURA
Bail, NDPS
A. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023—Section 483—Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Sections 21(c), 25, 29, 37, 50—Bail—Commercial quantity—Rigours of Section 37—Where contraband of commercial quantity is involved, rigours of Section 37 NDPS Act apply and bail cannot be granted unless twin conditions are satisfied—Mere procedural objections or arguments on merits are insufficient to dilute statutory embargo—Bail rejected. [Paras 24, 25] B. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 50—Compliance—Stage of consideration—Question whether mandatory safeguards under Section 50 have been complied with or not is a matter to be examined during trial and not at the stage of bail—Court should refrain from undertakin...
(2) ALLAHABAD
Maintainability
A. Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021—Sections 32, 34, 35—Constitution of India—Articles 226 & 227—Maintainability—Orders passed by Rent Tribunal under Section 35, presided over by District Judge/ADJ, are judicial orders of a Civil Court—Such orders are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226—Remedy lies under supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.[Paras 30, 31, 46, 54] B. Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021—Sections 32, 34, 35—Rent Tribunal—Nature—Persona designata vs Civil Court—Rent Tribunal is presided by District Judge/ADJ as a pre-existing judicial authority, not as persona designata—Exercises powers of Civil Court, renders binding adjudications, and forms part of judicial hierarchy...
(3) PATNA
Investigation
A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 302 read with Section 34—Arms Act, 1959—Section 27—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 313—Appreciation of evidence—Related witnesses—Conviction can be sustained on the basis of testimony of related witnesses if found reliable and trustworthy—Mere absence of independent witnesses is not fatal—Minor contradictions regarding place or manner of presence of witnesses do not affect core prosecution case—Interested witnesses cannot be discarded solely on ground of relationship. [Paras 46, 53, 65] B. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Sections 174, 154, 156—Investigation—Inquest—Commencement prior to FIR—Proceedings under Section 174 CrPC (inquest) are distinct from investigation of cognizable offence&mdas...
(4) ALLAHABAD
Eviction
A. Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021—Section 21(2)(m)—Eviction—Landlord’s requirement—Scope—Under Section 21(2)(m), landlord is only required to demonstrate that the premises are needed for his occupation—Requirement of proving “bona fide need” or comparative hardship, as existed under repealed U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, stands consciously omitted—Court cannot import such conditions—Once requirement is pleaded and remains unrebutted, eviction is justified. [Paras 12, 16, 33, 38] B. Statutory Interpretation—Casus omissus—Plain meaning rule—Where legislature has deliberately omitted expressions such as “bona fide requirement”, Court cannot reintroduce them by interpretation—Provision must be construed strict...
(6) HIMACHAL PRADESH
A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 447—Criminal trespass—Acquittal upheld—Prosecution must prove intent to insult, intimidate, or annoy the person in possession of the land—Mere possession, even if illegal, is insufficient to constitute criminal trespass—Demarcation conducted in absence of the accused and without following proper procedure held inadmissible—Complaint lacking averments regarding requisite intent—Essential ingredients of Section 447 IPC not satisfied. [Paras 6, 19, 22, 24] B. Indian Forest Act, 1927—Sections 26, 4—Prosecution for acts in reserved forest—Acquittal upheld—No evidence produced to show notification declaring the land as reserved forest—Notification relied upon did not specify relevant Khasra numbers—Mandatory requirements of ...
(7) HIMACHAL PRADESH
A. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 447—Criminal trespass—Mere possession of Government land without intent to insult, intimidate, or annoy does not constitute criminal trespass—Complaint failing to specifically aver such intent—Essential ingredients of Section 447 IPC not satisfied. [Paras 6, 17, 19] B. Indian Forest Act, 1927—Sections 29, 30, 31, 33—Encroachment of Government land—Encroachment below 10 bighas—As per precedent, FIR not lodgable—Notification declaring reserved/protected forest and its publication in vernacular language mandatory to attract penal consequences under Section 33—Failure to prove such publication renders prosecution unsustainable. [Paras 15, 20, 21, 23] C. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 437A—Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh...
(8) CALCUTTA
Quashing of proceeding, Criminal conspiracy
A. Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023—Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2)—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 482—Quashing of criminal proceedings—Partnership dispute—Allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust arising out of business disagreement—Trial Court rightly directed investigation after preliminary inquiry—At the stage of quashing, Court should not appreciate evidence—Criminal proceedings may be quashed where allegations do not prima facie constitute an offence or are inherently improbable—However, where materials exist suggesting commission of a cognizable offence, quashing would lead to miscarriage of justice—Petitioner's failure to cooperate with investigation and remaining absconding weighed against grant of relief—Held, not a fit case for quashing at...
(9) ORISSA
Writ petition
A. Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007—Section 16—Right of Appeal—Section 16 of the Act clearly and unambiguously grants the right of appeal only to senior citizens or parents aggrieved by an order of the Tribunal, to the exclusion of any other person, including children or other relatives—Consequently, an appeal filed by a son challenging a maintenance order passed in favour of his elderly mother is not maintainable, as he is neither a senior citizen nor a parent. [Paras 10–12] B. Jurisdiction—Appeal filed without statutory right—An appeal preferred before an Appellate Tribunal without a statutory right of appeal is not entertainable and the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the same—Any order passed in such an appeal is liable to be quashed. [Para 13...
(10) CHHATTISGARH
Bail Application
A. Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023—Section 483—Bail—Applicant alleged to be part of organized crime syndicate involving extortion from coal transporters—Considering gravity of economic offence, magnitude of illegal funds, prima facie evidence, active role, likelihood of tampering with evidence and risk of absconding, bail rejected. [Paras 21–26] B. Criminal Law—Economic Offences—Economic offences committed for personal profit with wider impact on public funds and economy require stricter approach in bail matters due to deep-rooted conspiracies. [Paras 21–22] C. Bail—Factors for Grant—Nature of accusation, evidence, severity of punishment, character of accused, likelihood of presence at trial, possibility of witness tampering, and larger public interest must be consi...
