(1) SUPREME COURT
Acquittal
A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Sections 20, 50—Search and seizure—Compliance with statutory safeguards—Accused apprehended while carrying a bag allegedly containing 11 kg 50 g of charas—Trial Court convicted accused under Section 20 NDPS Act—High Court set aside conviction holding that provisions of Section 50 were not complied with—Investigating Officer gave the accused three options for search, including search before a police officer, whereas Section 50 mandates that the accused must be apprised only of the right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate—Providing a third option contrary to the statutory mandate vitiates the search and recovery—Non-compliance with Section 50 renders the recovery suspect and conviction unsustainable—Acqui...
(2) SUPREME COURT
Service Law
A. Service Law—Recruitment—Eligibility—Higher qualification—Whether exclusion permissible— Recruitment to the post of Supervisor (ICDS) from Anganwadi Workers under Special Rules for Kerala Social Welfare Subordinate Services—Rule provided 29% vacancies for Anganwadi Workers possessing SSLC with 10 years’ experience and additionally earmarked 11% vacancies for graduate Anganwadi Workers—Held, mere earmarking of 11% ratio for graduates does not exclude graduate Anganwadi Workers from competing in the 29% quota meant for Anganwadi Workers with SSLC and requisite experience—Higher qualification cannot operate as a disqualification unless the rule expressly provides exclusion—Graduates possessing SSLC and requisite experience remain eligible to apply under the 29% quota as well&mdash...
(3) SUPREME COURT
Compensation
A. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Section 166—Motor accident compensation—Deduction of benefits received under employer’s group insurance—Permissibility—Tribunal deducted amounts received by claimants under employer-provided group insurance while determining compensation—High Court set aside such deduction and awarded full compensation—Held, benefits received by dependants under group insurance or employer-provided schemes arise from an independent contractual relationship and do not have a direct nexus with the statutory compensation payable under the Motor Vehicles Act—Such amounts cannot be treated as “pecuniary advantages” liable for deduction—Principle of balancing loss and gain cannot be invoked to reduce statutory compensation—High Court rightly disallowed dedu...
(4) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail
A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 438—Anticipatory bail—Grant of—FIR registered under Sections 328, 376, 406 and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860—High Court rejected anticipatory bail—Supreme Court granted interim protection during pendency of appeal—Appellant contended that relationship between parties was consensual, that he had cooperated with investigation and appeared before the Trial Court after filing of charge-sheet—Held, considering the circumstances and cooperation with investigation, appellant entitled to relief under Section 438 CrPC—Impugned order of High Court set aside and anticipatory bail granted in the event of arrest. (Paras 4–7) B. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 438—Anticipatory bail—Conditions—While granting anti...
(5) SUPREME COURT
Rape
A. Penal Code, 1860—Sections 376(2)(g), 506—Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973—Section 374—Rape—Conviction based on sole testimony of prosecutrix—Delay in FIR—Appreciation of evidence— Allegation of gang rape by four accused—FIR lodged after about three months and twenty-four days—Prosecutrix claimed delay due to fear and shame but did not disclose the incident even to family members and allegedly informed an unidentified woman whose testimony was not produced—Material contradictions found between FIR, statement under Section 164 CrPC and deposition before Court regarding place of occurrence, distance of spot and surrounding circumstances—No independent witnesses or corroborative evidence produced though incident allegedly occurred near a populated locality—Defenc...
(6) SUPREME COURT
Auction sale
A. Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993—Auction sale of mortgaged property—Challenge to valuation—Remand by High Court—Scope— Auction conducted in recovery proceedings and sale confirmed—High Court upheld validity of auction but remitted matter to Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for limited reconsideration of valuation and reserve price—Held, such remand does not disturb the rights of a bona fide auction purchaser nor the recovery already effected—Principle of finality attached to confirmed judicial auction sales cannot be invoked to prevent scrutiny where issues relating to adequacy of valuation or fixation of reserve price require examination—Matter rightly remitted for limited adjudication. (Paras 11–20) B. Judicial Sales—Court-confir...
(7) SUPREME COURT
A. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 32—Doctrine of delay and laches—Petition for enforcement of fundamental rights— Doctrine of laches operates as a flexible rule of practice and not a rigid rule of law—Its application depends upon sound judicial discretion based on the facts and circumstances of each case—Mere length of delay or apprehension of administrative or institutional disruption cannot by itself bar a petition under Article 32—The decisive consideration is whether the delay has been satisfactorily explained and whether entertaining the petition would prejudice third-party rights—Unexplained delay may justify refusal of relief, but a petition cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of delay where adequate explanation exists. (Paras 23–54) B. Constitution of India, 1...
(8) SUPREME COURT
A. Criminal Procedure—Bail (Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 IPC; 3, 25, 27 Arms Act, 1959)—Appellant, accused in FIR Case Crime No.216 of 2023, sought bail after over two years of incarceration—High Court of Allahabad had denied bail noting grievous firearm injuries to victim and alleged attempts by defence to delay trial—Supreme Court granted leave, observing contradictions in statements and that co-accused with overt acts were enlarged on bail. [Paras 1–3] B. Trial Proceedings—Delay and Conduct—Trial impacted by riot situation instigated by victim within Court premises; accused and counsel non-cooperation noted—Supreme Court held delay not attributable to appellant and prolonged incarceration serves no purpose pending trial. [Paras 4–5] C. Bail Conditions—Appearance and Trial...
(9) SUPREME COURT
A. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002—Bail (Sections 3 & 4)—Appellant, a revenue inspector, accused in ECIR Case No.1 of 2023 under Sections 3 and 4, sought bail after being arrested on 14th April, 2023—High Court of Jharkhand had rejected bail; Supreme Court granted leave and considered facts and circumstances of the case. [Paras 2–5] B. Criminal Procedure—Trial in Progress—Evidence of 5 out of 31 proposed witnesses recorded—Nine co-accused, including a Deputy Commissioner allegedly involved in bribery, had been granted bail by this Court and High Court—Supreme Court observed further detention of appellant pending trial was unnecessary. [Paras 5–6] C. Bail Conditions—Compliance—Appellant granted bail subject to furnishing bail bonds and adhering to condit...
(10) SUPREME COURT
Conviction upheld
A. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988—Sections 7 and 13(2)—Illegal gratification—Accused, an Excise Department constable, convicted for demanding and accepting bribe—Trap arranged by vigilance authorities and phenolphthalein powder test confirmed acceptance of tainted money—Oral testimonies of complainant and shadow witness corroborated prosecution case—Conviction upheld. [Paras 11–25] B. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988—Defence contentions—Plea of enmity between complainant and accused and alleged contradictions in evidence rejected—Court held testimonies of complainant (PW-1) and shadow witness (PW-2) trustworthy and consistent with trap proceedings—Defence failed to produce material evidence to substantiate allegations of false implication. [Paras 8, 12–15] ...
(1) BOMBAY
The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, an employee who completes the prescribed probation period is deemed to have acquired permanency—In this case, an Assistant Teacher was orally terminated without notice or an opportunity of hearing, which amounted to a violation of the principles of natural justice—Evidence such as the seniority list and inspection reports established that the teacher had rendered continuous service and had attained deemed permanency—The School Tribunal therefore ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits—The matter was earlier remanded by the High Court for fresh consideration due to denial of hearing—However, despite receiving notice and multiple opportunities, the management failed to participate in th...
(2) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Bail
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Sections 18 and 37 impose strict conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotic substances—Section 37 makes bail difficult because the court must be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and will not commit any offence while on bail—However, courts have recognized that the right to a speedy trial, which forms part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be ignored—In cases of prolonged delay in trial and extended incarceration, continued detention may violate the accused’s fundamental rights—The court held that excessive pre-trial imprisonment effectively becomes punitive rather than preventive—Therefore, the strict rigors of Section 37 may be diluted when the trial is unduly delayed—Accordingly,...
(3) CALCUTTA
A. Administrative Law—Blacklisting—Petitioners banned from carrying out fumigation treatments under NSPMs-12 and 22 without prior notice or hearing—Clause 2.5 of NSPM-12 requires issuance of show cause notice and suspension thrice within five years before blacklisting—No suspension recorded for petitioners—Held, blacklisting order quashed for violation of natural justice and statutory guidelines. [Paras 5, 15, 28–29] B. Criminal Law—Presumption of innocence—Petitioners involved in ongoing criminal proceedings—Court held that presumption of innocence applies until guilt is proven after proper trial—Blacklisting based solely on allegations without adjudication impermissible. [Paras 17, 19, 28] C. Principles of Natural Justice—Blacklisting and banning without fair hearin...
(4) BOMBAY
A. Employees Compensation Act, 1923—Sections 2(1)(d), 4, and 8—Dependents and legal heirs—Original claimant deceased during pendency of proceedings—Claim initiated by deceased dependent survives and may be continued by legal representatives or heirs—Legal heirs need not independently qualify as dependents to be impleaded and pursue the claim. [Paras 12–18] B. Employees Compensation Act, 1923—Sections 4 and 8—Welfare legislation—Objective to provide financial relief for employment-related accidents—Claim should not extinguish merely due to claimant’s death during pendency—Legal representatives permitted to step into claimant’s place to ensure justice and fulfill purpose of Act. [Paras 19] C. Employees Compensation Act, 1923—Sections 2(1)(d), 4, and 8&...
(5) BOMBAY
A. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947—Sections 10(1)(c), 12(5), 25B and 25F—Workman entitled to protection against illegal termination—Petitioner employed as sweeper for over 11 years, alleged payment below minimum wages, harassment, and termination without notice or retrenchment compensation—Reference made by Deputy Commissioner of Labour for adjudication of reinstatement and back wages. [Paras 2–4, 11–14] B. Evidence and burden of proof—Muster rolls, salary vouchers, duty list, and oral testimony produced as secondary evidence—Labour Court allowed reliance on such evidence, drawing adverse inference against respondent for non-production of records—Respondent denied employer-employee relationship; court held existence of employment relationship established on preponderance of probabilit...
(6) BOMBAY
A. Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952—Section 8F—Recovery from third parties—Third party filed affidavit denying liability under Section 8F(3)(vi)—Held, statutory protection afforded to such affidavit—Authority cannot compel payment unless it proves that the sworn statement was false in a material particular—Burden of proof lies on the authority; suspicion alone insufficient. [Paras 19–21] B. Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952—Section 8F—Recovery from third parties—Authority must demonstrate that third party either owes money to employer or holds money for/on behalf of employer—Legal relationship under which funds are held must be real and identifiable—Recovery cannot be based solely on suspicion. ...
(7) CALCUTTA
A. Commercial Courts Act, 2015—Section 2(1)(c)(vii)—Commercial dispute—Suit arising out of agreement concerning immovable property used exclusively for trade or commerce—Plaintiff acknowledged existence of registered lease deed and accepted rent/occupation charges after expiry of lease—Issue involved interpretation of lease deed and jural relationship between parties—Held, suit qualifies as commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c)(vii). [Paras 18, 24–29] B. Transfer of Property Act, 1882—Section 106—Lease agreement post notice under Section 106—Determination of jural relationship between landlord and tenant—Plaintiff claimed eviction of defendants as trespassers but referred to registered lease deed—Held, lease agreement must be interpreted to decide nature of rela...
(8) CALCUTTA
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 34—Challenge to arbitral award—Tribunal relied on personal knowledge and expertise instead of material evidence—Held, such reliance violates fundamental policy of Indian law and principles of natural justice—Arbitral tribunal must adjudicate solely on evidence produced by parties and in accordance with contract terms. [Paras 17–59] B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 18—Equal treatment of parties—Tribunal applied double standards by accepting appellant’s pre-retrieval reports and discarding respondent’s post-retrieval reports without valid justification—Delay in producing reports corresponded with retrieval of Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)—Violation of Section 18 observed. [Paras 61–71] C....
(9) CHHATTISGARH
A. Administrative Law—Canal Construction and Technical Expertise—Challenge to the alignment and execution of a canal project under the Rajeev Gandhi Sanwardhan Scheme was raised by appellants, contending that the project adversely affected them—The Court held that determination of whether the canal should follow a straight or curved alignment falls within the domain of technical experts—In the absence of arbitrariness, mala fide intent, or illegality, judicial interference is not warranted—The Detailed Project Report (DPR) was prepared following proper technical assessment and approved by competent authorities—The appellants failed to demonstrate any infringement of their fundamental rights—The dismissal of the writ petition by the Single Judge was upheld. [Paras 7–8] B. Administrative L...
(10) CHHATTISGARH
A. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 226—Judicial review of tender process—Rejection of technical bid for non-compliance with prescribed format for Pre-Contract Integrity Pact—Tender authority entitled to insist on strict adherence to terms and conditions of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT)—Rejection not arbitrary or irrational; court’s review limited to arbitrariness, mala fide, or discriminatory decisions. B. Government Order dated 27.11.2014—Tender process—Clause (iv) addresses scenario where multiple bids are received but only one qualifies technically—Such situation does not amount to a "single tender"—Financial bid of technically qualified bidder can be opened and considered—Award of work to sole qualified bidder held valid and not contrary to government or...
