(1) SUPREME COURT
Arbitral award
A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 29A(4) & (5)—Extension of mandate—Award rendered after expiry of statutory time—An application under Section 29A(5) seeking extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is maintainable even after the expiry of the periods prescribed under Sections 29A(1) and 29A(3) and even after an award is rendered in the interregnum—The statute does not prescribe any threshold bar against entertaining such an application post-award—Power and jurisdiction of the Court under Section 29A are not denuded by the arbitrator’s act of delivering an award without mandate. [Paras 1–2, 14–17, 21–23] B. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Section 29A—Nature and effect of award passed without mandate—An arbitral award r...
(2) SUPREME COURT
Anticipatory bail
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 438—Anticipatory Bail—Grant of—Offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 5 of MPID Act, 1999—High Court rejected anticipatory bail—Supreme Court had granted interim protection—Investigation under IPC completed and charge-sheet filed—No charge-sheet filed under MPID Act—Accused cooperated with investigation—Interim protection made absolute—Anticipatory bail granted. [Paras 6–9, 11] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471—Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999—Sections 3, 4 & 5—Anticipatory Bail—Effect of filing of charge-sheet—Serious allegations of financial fraud and misappropriation&md...
(3) SUPREME COURT
Suspension of sentence
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 389—Suspension of Sentence—Pending Criminal Appeal—Conviction under Section 302 IPC and life imprisonment—Appellant undergone about fourteen years of actual incarceration—Appeal pending since 2016—Repeated rejection of suspension applications by High Court—Likelihood of inordinate delay in disposal of appeal—Long incarceration held to be a relevant and determinative factor—Refusal to suspend sentence held unjustified—Sentence suspended and bail granted pending appeal. [Paras 6–9, 11] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 498-A, 304-B—Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961—Sections 3 & 4—Suspension of Sentence—Principles governing—Seriousness of offence and nature of conviction not sole ba...
(4) SUPREME COURT
Bail
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Bail—Grant of Bail by Supreme Court—Interference with High Court order rejecting bail—Serious offences under IPC, Prevention of Corruption Act and Motor Vehicles Act—Appellants not principal offenders—Allegations primarily of post-occurrence conspiracy and evidence manipulation—Long incarceration up to about eighteen months—Large number of prosecution witnesses and likelihood of delay in trial—Continued detention held unjustified—High Court order rejecting bail set aside—Bail granted with stringent conditions. [Paras 7–12] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 201, 467, 468, 471, 120-B read with Section 34—Bail—Nature of allegations—Appellants neither named as perpetrators of accident nor accused of causin...
(5) SUPREME COURT
Investigation
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023—Section 35(3)—Investigation—Appearance before Investigating Officer—Dispute regarding issuance of statutory notice and appearance of accused before I.O.—In order to resolve controversy, accused directed to appear before Investigating Officer at specified date and time without awaiting further notice—Investigating Officer granted liberty to proceed with investigation and submit status report—Matter directed to be listed for further consideration. [Paras 1–2] Result : Appearance Directed Investigation Continues ...
(6) SUPREME COURT
NDPS
A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 21(b)—Bail—Intermediate quantity—Regular bail earlier rejected by High Court—Accused in custody for about six months—Quantity involved intermediary—Without commenting on merits, continued incarceration not justified—Bail granted on appropriate conditions. [Paras 1–3] B. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Bail—Conditions of Release—Accused directed to be released on furnishing bail bonds and sureties to satisfaction of Trial Court—Obligation to regularly attend trial—Liberty reserved to Trial Court to take appropriate action in case of violation of bail conditions—Special Leave Petition allowed. [Paras 3–5] Result : SLP Allowed Bail ...
(7) SUPREME COURT
A. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 136—Special Leave Petition—Dismissal at threshold—No ground made out for interference with impugned judgment—Special leave petition dismissed without issuing notice to the respondent—However, equitable relief granted by granting time to vacate suit premises. [Paras 1, 3, 4] B. Civil Procedure—Eviction—Grant of Time to Vacate—Prayer for time to vacate suit premises granted till a specified date—Subject to payment of arrears of rent within stipulated period and regular payment of future rent—Undertaking to be filed before Registrar of High Court—Creation of third-party rights prohibited—Failure to file undertaking or comply with conditions to entitle landlord to execute decree—Non-compliance to be treated as vio...
(8) SUPREME COURT
NDPS
A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Sections 21(c), 25, 29—Suspension of Sentence—Conviction under NDPS Act—Sentence of ten years’ rigorous imprisonment with fine—High Court declined suspension of sentence pending appeal—Petitioner has already undergone about four years of imprisonment—Offence relates to Codeine Phosphate Syrup (psychotropic substance)—During pendency of criminal appeal, sentence suspended by Supreme Court notwithstanding rejection by High Court. [Paras 2, 3, 4, 6] B. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Suspension of Sentence Pending Appeal—Consideration of long incarceration—Existence of criminal antecedents not decisive by itself—Balance between gravity of offence and period of sentence already undergone—Appropriate...
(9) SUPREME COURT
Bail
A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Bail—Grant of Bail by Supreme Court—Special leave petition filed against rejection of regular bail by High Court—Case based predominantly on documentary evidence—Petitioner in custody since 30.09.2024—Custody exceeding 16 months—Trial likely to take considerable time—Without commenting on merits, continued incarceration held unwarranted—Petitioner directed to be released on bail on appropriate conditions. [Paras 1, 3, 4] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34—Bail—Forgery and cheating offences—Nature of accusations documentary—Long pre-trial detention—Right to personal liberty weighed against prosecutorial interest—Bail granted subject to compliance with conditions—Liberty of St...
(10) SUPREME COURT
Sexual harassment
A. Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013—Section 18—Appeal—Scope—Armed Forces personnel—Section 18 of the POSH Act confers a statutory right of appeal against the report and recommendations of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC)—Where service rules provide for adjudication by a Tribunal, such appeal is maintainable before that Tribunal—Armed Forces Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against ICC findings when read conjointly with Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007—High Court erred in holding that no appeal lay against ICC recommendations. [Paras 22–26] B. Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007—Section 14—Jurisdiction—POSH Act appeal—Failure to exercise jurisdiction—When an...
(1) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Abetment of Suicide
Copyright Act, 1957—Section 14, 51—Infringement—Rights and Remedies A. Copyright Act, 1957—Section 14—Exclusive Rights—Copyright vests in the author of a literary, artistic, musical, or cinematographic work the exclusive right to reproduce, adapt, distribute, perform, or communicate the work to the public. (Para 2) B. Copyright Act, 1957—Section 51—Infringement—Unauthorized use of a copyrighted work, including reproduction, adaptation, sale, or public communication, constitutes infringement, regardless of intent. (Para 3) C. Copyright Act, 1957—Exceptions—Limited exceptions such as private study, research, criticism, review, and reporting of current events do not amount to infringement. (Para 4) D. Remedies—Civil remedies include injunction, damages, and a...
(2) PUNJAB & HARYANA
Copyright Act, 1957—Section 14, 51—Infringement—Exclusive Rights—Remedies A. Definition and Scope—Copyright grants the creator of a literary, artistic, musical, or cinematographic work exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, perform, or communicate the work to the public. (Sec. 14) B. Infringement—Any unauthorized use of a copyrighted work, including reproduction, adaptation, sale, or communication to the public, constitutes infringement. Innocent intention does not absolve liability. (Sec. 51) C. Exceptions and Fair Use—Certain uses, such as private study, research, criticism, or reporting, may not amount to infringement, provided they are within statutory exceptions. D. Remedies for Infringement—Civil remedies include injunction, damages, or accounts of profits; criminal rem...
(3) ALLAHABAD
A. Criminal Procedure Code—Police encounter—Compliance with Supreme Court guidelines—Reiteration of directions in PUCL v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 10 SCC 635—Mandatory registration of FIR in all cases of police encounters resulting in death or grievous injury—Independent investigation to be conducted by CID or by a team headed by an officer senior in rank to head of police team involved—Statement of injured person to be recorded before Magistrate or Medical Officer. (Paras 5, 6 & 13) B. Police conduct—Use of force—Unjustified firing—Infliction of firearm injuries below knee level for extraneous considerations such as career advancement or public image impermissible—Police cannot assume role of judiciary in punishing accused—Right to life and dignity under Art. 21 ...
(4) CALCUTTA
Statutory presumption
A. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Sections 138 & 139—Dishonour of cheque—Legally enforceable debt—Statutory presumption—Accused admitted issuance of cheque but pleaded that cheque was issued as security for a different transaction—Defence of cheque issued for security without cogent proof held untenable—Once execution of cheque admitted, presumption under Sections 118 and 139 operates—Absence of written loan agreement not fatal—Complainant established ingredients of Section 138 by oral and documentary evidence—Accused failed to rebut statutory presumption—Conviction upheld. [Paras 10 to 16, 29 to 30] B. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Demand notice—Service and compliance—Cheque dishonoured for insufficiency of funds—S...
(5) DELHI
Civil Suit For Recovery
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Section 96—Appeal against decree—Recovery suit based on promissory notes and cheques—Proof of execution—Suit for recovery of money decreed on basis of two promissory notes and five undated cheques—Promissory notes bearing signatures of deceased borrower—Defendants neither specifically pleaded forgery of handwriting/signatures nor led evidence to disprove execution—Plaintiff proved signatures by summoning bank record—Undated cheques, though not bills of exchange, held to possess corroborative evidentiary value—Trial Court rightly decreed recovery applying preponderance of probabilities—No infirmity in decree—Appeal dismissed. [Paras 18 to 24, 29] B. Evidence Act, 1872—Burden of proof—Denial of signatures—Failure t...
(6) DELHI
Rejection of plaint, Agreement to Sell
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (d)—Transfer of Property Act, 1882—Section 54—Rejection of plaint—Title in the suit property—On the basis of unregistered agreement to sell—An unregistered agreement to sell, without a registered sale deed, does not confer title under Section 54 of T.P. Act—In the absence of a Sale Deed, would not confer valid title—A General Power of Attorney and a receipt do not amount to transfer of ownership, as a power of attorney only creates an agency and is not a sale—In the absence of any registered title document in favour of the plaintiff, the suit is vexatious and does not disclose a cause of action, and is liable to be rejected. B. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Order VII Rule 11(a)—Rejection of plaint—Agreement...
(7) DELHI
Territorial jurisdiction
A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Section 19—Territorial jurisdiction in defamation suits—Principles governing forum selection—Defamation suit based on publication of allegedly defamatory content on the internet—Held, mere nationwide accessibility does not confer jurisdiction everywhere—Two governing principles laid down: (i) Merger Rule—If defamatory content causes harm at the place where the defendant resides or carries on business, suit must be filed there; and (ii) Maximum Wrong Rule—Where no part of the wrong is done at the place of defendant’s residence, jurisdiction lies where the maximum harm to reputation is suffered—Plaintiff cannot choose forum arbitrarily. [Paras 29, 34, 38, 66] B. Defamation on the Internet—Determination of situs of wrong—Online...
(8) ALLAHABAD
Complainant
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138, 7, 9 and 142—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 401 and 397—Cheque dishonour—Complaint by third party—Not permissible—A complaint u/s 138 of the Act, for dishonour of a cheque is maintainable only at the instance of the "payee" or the "holder in due course" of the cheque, as explicitly stipulated under Section 142(1)(a) of the Act—A "third party" or a stranger having no legal title to the cheque as a payee or holder in due course lacks the locus standi to institute such a complaint in their own name, even if they are indirectly affected by the transaction—While a complaint can be filed through an authorized representative (such as a power of attorney holder or company signatory), the complainant must remain ...
(9) CALCUTTA
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997—Sections 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 21, 22(2), 32—Ejectment Suit; Deposit of Rent; Deliberate Default; High Court Supervisory Jurisdiction—Constitution of India, 1950—Article 227: A. Deposit of Arrears and Current Rent: Tenant’s failure to deposit arrears and current rent as per court order, without seeking timely extension, amounts to deliberate default, justifying striking out of defence under Section 7(3). (Paras 2–5, 9–18) B. Extension of Time: Proviso to Section 7(2) permits extension only if application is made within original court-ordered period; belated applications are not maintainable. (Para 16) C. Remedies under Sections 21 & 32: Tenant’s non-availment of statutory remedies for non-acceptance or non-receipt of rent does not excuse defaul...
(10) CALCUTTA
Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order 18, Rule 17; Sections 11, 151—Re-examination of witnesses, Recall of Evidence, Res Judicata—Succession Act—Will and Probate: A. Re-examination of Witnesses: Power to recall witnesses under Order 18, Rule 17 CPC is discretionary and intended for clarification of issues, not for filling omissions in evidence after witnesses are fully examined and discharged. (Paras 21, 38, 39) B. Inherent Powers: Section 151 CPC permits recall in appropriate cases, but not to permit fresh evidence or complete omissions. (Paras 38–40) C. Examination-in-Chief: Under amended CPC, written statements of examination-in-chief are treated as oral evidence; adoption of earlier evidence does not constitute fresh evidence. (Para 42) D. Framing of Issues: Post-evidence framing cannot create a ne...
