slcdailylaw
  • Home
  • Topic Search
  • Advanced Search
  • Citation Search
  • Bookmarks
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Latest Cases
(1) JHARKHAND
Hostile witness

A. Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)—Sections 302, 304 Part II, 300 & 299—Murder v. culpable homicide not amounting to murder—Appellant assaulted deceased with a bamboo strip in an intoxicated state after refusal to supply liquor—No premeditation or deadly weapon used, and deceased succumbed to injuries two days later during treatment—Held, circumstances disclosed knowledge that death was likely, but not intention to cause death or such bodily injury as was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death—Conviction altered from S. 302 IPC to S. 304 Part II IPC—Convictions under Ss. 323 and 341 IPC affirmed—Sentence reduced to period already undergone. B. Evidence Act, 1872—Hostile witness—Evidentiary value—Testimony of hostile witnesses not liable to be rejected in t...

Disposed of
(2) JHARKHAND
Service Law

A. Service Law—Regularization—Casual/Part-Time Labourers—Educational qualification—Petitioners engaged as Part-Time Casual Labourers sought regularization under the CBIC Part Time Casual Labourers (Regularization) Scheme, 2020—Claim rejected for lack of prescribed matriculation qualification—Held, after abolition of Group-D posts, regularization could only be against Group-C posts requiring matriculation as the minimum eligibility—Absence of essential educational qualification constituted an incurable defect affecting eligibility, rendering appointment illegal and not merely irregular—Tribunal rightly declined regularization. B. Service Law—Illegal and irregular appointments—Distinction—Appointment made without possessing the prescribed educational qualification held to ...

Disposed of
(3) JHARKHAND

A. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Section 9—Restitution of conjugal rights—Proof of marriage and withdrawal from society—Wife established marriage through oral evidence corroborated by public documents including voter lists, Aadhaar card and voter ID showing husband as spouse—Husband's complete denial of marriage unsupported by credible evidence—Held, documentary evidence, though not conclusive, constituted reliable corroborative proof—Decree for restitution rightly granted. B. Evidence—Appreciation of evidence—Wife's testimony regarding cohabitation and subsequent expulsion on account of husband's illicit relationship supported by independent witnesses—Husband failed to rebut evidence by any convincing material—Findings held based on proper appreciation of evidenc...

Disposed of
(4) JHARKHAND

A. Penal Code, 1860—Sections 307, 353 & 412/34—Arms Act, 1959—Sections 25(1-B), 26 & 27—Criminal Law Amendment Act—Section 17—Conviction—Mere presence of the accused at the place of encounter and her marital relationship with a co-accused extremist, without proof of any overt act, conscious possession of arms, or active participation in the unlawful activities of the banned organisation, held insufficient to sustain conviction. B. Criminal Trial—Appreciation of evidence—Conviction cannot rest on suspicion, association or relationship alone—Prosecution must establish active involvement and guilt beyond reasonable doubt through reliable evidence. C. Evidence—Improvement in testimony—Material improvements made by a prosecution witness during cross-examinati...

(5) JHARKHAND
Murder, Culpable homicide

A. Penal Code, 1860—Section 304 Part II—Culpable homicide not amounting to murder—Conviction sustained where death was caused by fist blows resulting in rupture of the spleen and laceration of the lung—Internal injuries established that the accused had knowledge that the assault was likely to cause death, attracting Section 304 Part II IPC. B. Evidence—Ocular and medical evidence—Credible eyewitness testimony, duly corroborated by medical evidence and the deceased's oral dying declaration to family members, held sufficient to establish the prosecution case—Absence of external injuries not fatal where internal injuries clearly established the cause of death. C. Criminal Trial—Delay in lodging FIR—Delay of three days in registration of the FIR satisfactorily explained by attemp...

Appeal dismissed
(6) JHARKHAND

A. Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908—Section 71-A—Restoration proceedings—Restoration application instituted after an inordinate delay of about forty years from the original transaction held not maintainable, the power under Section 71-A being required to be exercised within a reasonable period. B. Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908—Section 71-A—Constructive res judicata—A second restoration proceeding filed after an earlier restoration case had attained finality, without challenging the earlier order, is barred by the principle of constructive res judicata and cannot be entertained. C. Constitution of India, 1950—Article 226—Writ of certiorari—High Court may interfere with concurrent appellate and revisional orders where material questions relating to limitation and constructive res ju...

Disposed of
(7) JHARKHAND

A. Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949—Sections 4(ix), 5 & 6—"Khas" and "Pradhani" villages—Classification of a village as "Khas" or "Pradhani" depends upon its existing statutory status and whether a hereditary headman is in office for the time being—Historical existence of a hereditary Pradhan alone does not permanently determine the character of the village. B. Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949—Appointment of Pradhan—Where no hereditary succession took place after the death of the last hereditary Pradhan and official records consistently treated the village as a "Khas" village for several decades, a subsequent claim of hereditary succession cannot revive "Pradhani" status. C. He...

Disposed of
(8) JHARKHAND
Abetment of Suicide

A. Penal Code, 1860—Section 306—Abetment of suicide—Ingredients—Mere matrimonial discord, allegations of extra-marital relationship, or breach of a promise to improve marital conduct do not by themselves constitute abetment of suicide—Prosecution must prove intentional instigation, active aid, or creation of circumstances leaving the deceased with no reasonable alternative except suicide, with a proximate nexus to the act. B. Penal Code, 1860—Section 306—Appreciation of evidence—Evidence showing continued marital and parental relationship, deceased's serious medical condition, and prior suicide attempt failed to establish that the accused's conduct directly drove the deceased to commit suicide—Essential ingredients of abetment not proved. C. Criminal Appeal—Acquitta...

(9) JHARKHAND
Maintainability

A. Constitution of India—Article 226—Public Interest Litigation—Maintainability—Bona fides and credentials of the petitioner are threshold considerations in PILs—Repeated filing of frivolous petitions and making unsubstantiated allegations against public officials undermines maintainability—Nevertheless, where allegations concern public interest and proceedings have already been entertained, Court may examine the matter on merits instead of rejecting the petition solely on the ground of the petitioner's conduct. B. Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980—Alleged unauthorised use of forest land—Allegations of illegal alienation of forest land and collusion of forest officials not substantiated by record—Authorities had already identified encroachments, initiated forest offence cases and ...

Disposed of
(10) JHARKHAND
Service Law, Condonation of delay

A. Limitation—Condonation of Delay—Delay of 163 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal—Sufficient cause shown—Delay condoned—Where satisfactory reasons are furnished for delay in preferring a Letters Patent Appeal, the Court may exercise discretion to condone the delay in the interest of justice—Delay of 163 days was accordingly condoned. (Paras 1–4, I.A. No. 13819 of 2024). B. Service Law—Departmental Enquiry—Principles of Natural Justice—Non-supply of enquiry report and second show-cause notice before imposing major penalty—Violation of natural justice—Failure to furnish the enquiry report along with the second show-cause notice prior to imposition of a major penalty amounts to denial of reasonable opportunity and breach of natural justice—Though prejudice mu...

slcdailylaw

Tomar Publication

561, Sec-2, Jagriti Vihar, Meerut-250004

0121 3561932, +91 9458 5523 61

tomarpublication999@gmail.com

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

© SLC Daily law all right reserved.

Cookies Required

Please enable cookies in your browser settings to continue.