slcdailylaw
  • Home
  • Topic Search
  • Advanced Search
  • Citation Search
  • Bookmarks
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Topic
(1) PATNA
Matrimonial cruelty, Burn injury

Penal Code, 1860—Section 302 and 498-A—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC)—Section 313—Murder—Matrimonial Cruelty—Death due to burn injury—Order of conviction—Appeal against—No suggestion has been made as to how did the deceased catch fire leading to her death—The absence of any emetic smell at the time of post mortem further confirms that the deceased may have died while cooking food—The places where the burn injuries were found by the Doctor were mostly on the upper part of the body—No burn injury on the face or neck which, perhaps, is the worst hit parts in the body if somebody is deliberately burnt to death—No evidence on record of any dowry demand which remained unfulfilled—Over a period of eight years, there was no complaint about the deceased being...

Allowed
(2) SUPREME COURT
Burn injury

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)—Section 304B—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC)—Section 154—Court, noting delayed FIR filing post-failed compromise, dismissed defense's accidental burn claim—Severe injuries on all body parts, inconsistent with accidental burns, pointed to intentional act—Medical evidence highlighted kerosene's pervasive impact, contradicting defense's limited spill theory—Court invoked Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, presuming foul play—The appeal partially succeeded, affirming intentional harm leading to unnatural death, challenging the concocted narrative—Verdict underscores meticulous scrutiny in cases of delayed reporting and compromised settlements in unnatural death investigations.  ...

Partly Allowed
(3)
Dowry death, Burn injury

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 313, Section 482 — Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 113B, Section 32(1) — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 304B, Section 498A — Dying declaration — Dowry death — Burn injury — Dying declaration should be voluntary and should not be prompted - Physical as well as mental fitness of maker is to be proved by prosecution. — Appeal dismissed. ...

Dismissed
slcdailylaw

Tomar Publication

561, Sec-2, Jagriti Vihar, Meerut-250004

0121 3561932, +91 9458 5523 61

tomarpublication999@gmail.com

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

© SLC Daily law all right reserved.